| Author |
Replies: 508 / Views: 75,709 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
151 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
151 Posts |
|
|
rod222 Thanks Forgot to upload this guy, Feb 29,1916- Yarra Junction Paul  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Paul, I mean to drag out my Western Australian bible, and see if the dropped date plug on the black swan is listed. That is quite pronounced, and there may be some gossip about it.
When you study the SA sixpence, you can see the ridiculous distance between impressions to allow for perforation. No wonder the stamp is radically perfed.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7070 Posts |
|
|
Great cancels, Paul. I should pick out the Birmingham cancel on the biggest-stamp thread and put it here...it's a pretty nice strike. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7070 Posts |
|
|
Here is the QV from the biggest stamps thread picked out from the larger scan:  And Edward from a couple years later and quite a few miles north:  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Paul, Your west aussie swan postmark is shown bottom right, last but one. (duplex cancel) I still have to look at the black swan cat to see if the dropped date plug is recorded.  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 04/10/2010 7:22 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
151 Posts |
|
|
rod222 Thanks for the info. I have been looking online and only been able to locate a couple of images of this cancel. Do you have any idea when it was first put into use? Thanks Paul |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Tough call, Paul. I am not aware if this cancel of yours is a CDS or a Duplex cancel. (Duplex cancel shown on the card) If it is a CDS the earliest known use [eku] is 15th July 1859. If it is part of a duplex cancel, then late 1864. There is no reference to the date slug in the WA work, but examples shown [proving covers] evidence the two numerals after 18 (18**) are of a different size, reasoning indicating removable plugs. HTH
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
If you have a healthy imagination Paul, (and what philatelist comes without this quality?  ) One of these likely lads may have struck your stamp, possibly the shy little lad, who is afraid to face the camera.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
151 Posts |
|
|
rod22 What great pic! Bet they had no idea people would be reviewing their work over 140 years later? Do you think the cancel on my stamp matches with the duplex cancel in the bottom right position of the card? Some of the letters "R" in Perth, "JA" in the date and alo the "6" seem to be different ( or maybe I have an over active healthy imagination )? Thanks for posting Paul |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
This is only a guess, but I reckon there would be a fair volume of mail passing through Perth, even though gold was not discovered until the 1880's, but I would suspect multiple CDS's and duplexes. The card merely shows "typical" examples, and you would need to compare your stamp with known strikes.
The evidence on your stamp would point to a CDS, because with duplex cancels (generally) the stamp would receive the killer, with the CDS portion on the cover.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 04/11/2010 11:07 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
4031 Posts |
|
|
 Yes! This one is postally used. It must be an invisible postmark.  Amazing postage from an Australian decimal variations dealer. Received with much thanks from one of the good guys. KGV. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
4031 Posts |
|
|
Rod I did not write the rare perf David Mallen did. I looked it up and it is because it is a sheet stamp. His variations catalogue has helped me with some of the mysteries in Aust dec. KGV
Edit more info. The normal perf is 14x14.4 var 14x13.7 This var is in all denoms in sheet form. The 2nd perf is the rare one.
Other Tourist Precincts variations 4x55c booklet perf 11.2x11.2 4x55c roll stamps 12.7x12.8
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by KGV Collector - 04/16/2010 08:00 am |
|
Replies: 508 / Views: 75,709 |
|