Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Great Britain 1p Black #1 Plate Error?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 788Next Topic  
Valued Member
Germany
221 Posts
Posted 07/20/2020   5:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add LordInVader to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hello all Stamp Masters,

I was checking out this Penny Black, and noticed that on the top right corner, to the left of the maltese cross, there seems to be a disturbance in the ink.
In other words: There is ink missing, a white hole if you will.

Also: In the black background, to the top right of the head, on top of the bun, there seem to also be errors in the ink.

Would these be actual plate errors?

What is the consensus here?

Would this add value? Or detract value?


Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
6530 Posts
Posted 07/20/2020   5:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NSK to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It looks like an example from plate 7. It is quite far cut into the bottom of the stamp. That lowers the value considerably.

This is not a listed constant flaw. Maybe it is wear. This plate is known for that. The paper where the ink is missing looks whiter than the margins and the red ink of the Maltese Cross also appears to be missing here. Have you checked whether it is the ink that is missing or the surface that is missing?

The foot of the T and the right of the top loop in the S also have white spots. The spot at the foot of the T looks like a break in the cancellation as well.

The NW and NE rays of the right-hand star look suspicious.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by NSK - 07/20/2020 5:49 pm
Valued Member
Germany
221 Posts
Posted 07/20/2020   8:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add LordInVader to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the information!
So I looked at the specimen under a magnifying glass.
It looks as though the red ink of the cancel covers part of the blemish, as marked below:

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Germany
221 Posts
Posted 07/22/2020   08:36 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add LordInVader to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Btw, why do you say that the NW and NE rays of the right-hand star look suspicious?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
6530 Posts
Posted 07/22/2020   09:07 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NSK to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes. On my screen, they show a much deeper black than the remainder of that star. They also continue outside the frame, especially the NW ray. That one looks as if someone used a pen to redraw the ray.

Also, the SW part of the area that you outline and where the red of the Maltese Cross is visible, it looks as if the background is black and not whitish.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by NSK - 07/22/2020 09:12 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1017 Posts
Posted 07/22/2020   2:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add billsey to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Perhaps a scan of the back would point toward a possible repair?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
6530 Posts
Posted 07/22/2020   3:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NSK to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
OP included a scan of the back in his original post.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3282 Posts
Posted 07/22/2020   6:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bobby De La Rue to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The missing ink on the stamp will most likely be from plate wear I'd say.

I agree with NSK, plate 7.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 788Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.2 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05