Request Help With A Catalogue Number On A Steiner Page

What is the Scott and/or Stanley Gibbions catalogue number for the booklet on the left?

Thank you

Shown in an online catalogue as Scott #1113Gh

But Scott lists that number under 1998-99 not 2001. Then under Self Adhesive Coil Stamps says No. 1113F,1113G 5/3/01.
Then there's Fi and Gj, same stamps with different perforations. If F and G are paired to become Gk and in a booklet pane as Gh as listed, are Fi and Gj also paired to become ?? with booklet #?? or are Fi and Gj not from the same booklet? And if not from the same booklet then what booklet?

Thank you.

The left one appears to be Hibernian book HB67ap (pane HP109pa).

This is a re-issue of HB67p (pane HP109p).
Book HB67 10 x 30p goldcrest and blackbird alternating and imperforate at top and bottom of the pane was printed by ISSP (Irish Security Stamp Printing Ltd.) was issued 4 September 1998).
The book was reprinted (HB67p) containing stamps with 2mm wide phosphor frames and issued 25 January 1999. These had perforations 14.25 x 14.75.

The one you are looking for: HB67ap (HP109pa)
The listing in the Hibernian has been updated and is not completely consistent (stamps issued 25 April 2001, but book issued ? March 2001). The perforation is quite different from what my old 2009 edition states, being 10.75 x 13.25 and thus different from the 1998/1999 ISSP books. The book, apparently, was printed by Questa.

The stamps are gummed. The front cover shows a blackbird on a branch. At the bottom is a green bar stating it is a stamp book and from An Post. To the right of the blackbird is a blue area with £3 in white.

The right one appears to be Hibernian HB90 (pane issued 9 October 2001, containing the self-adhesive stamps with "N" (national tariff). This has a reddish cover with green bars top and bottom. It shows "ten stamps" in yellow and orange and to the left the blackbird stamp.

Had some time to look at these stamps.

First: the cover



Second: the 1998 and 1999 ISSP panes. The former has no phosphor frame, the latter has.



Third: ISSP and Questa (or at least, it should be)



The Questa stamps (pair on top) appear on a somewhat brighter white paper. Also, both have the same number of perforation holes horizontally. I make this just under 14.25 gauge. The 10.25 does not make much sense. I never heard of Questa using this gauge.
Vertically, the perforations line up. The 13.25 gauge also appears incorrect. 15 is closer to the mark. I am tempted to say the 2020 Hibernian is incorrect and the 2009 is correct.

I find the Questa perforation to be somewhat erratic. The ISSP one appears much more regular.

Fourth: Éire



It appears the stamp at the top - that should be the 2001 stamp - has a wider setting of the word "Éire." Now, pictures can give incorrect images. I measure the original booklet stamp's inscription as 9 mm at the centre of the word "Éire." The booklet with phosphor frame has it 8.5 mm. And, surprisingly, the stamp on top - the Questa one - has it 8mm wide.

Fifth: phosphor
Well: the Questa stamp to the left is much duller under long-wave uv light than the ISSP one.

NSK: Thank you for the great response. You've help me and many other collectors with Ireland.

Disregard what I wrote above. I just saw - probably a misidentified - that shows this booklet with the barcode shown in my picture.

There also is a booklet with barcode 5 391346 000409. This shows 12 full perforation holes horizontally. This also would coincide with the 10.25 gauge. The poster identifies this as the 1998 book. I have a strong suspicion he mixed up his 2001 and 1998 books. This, almost certainly, is the 2001 book. This raises a question about my "Questa" stamps. They may be ISSP stamps with a duller phosphor.

I'm glad to hear that I am not the only person befuddled by what the catalogs present with these stamps.

I think the Hibernian handbook is an excellent resource. The 2020 edition shows much improvement on the already good 2009 edition. However, there remain some areas for improvement. As I note in my thread on the Ïrish Symbols" definitives, it fails to mention when the 6d "Sword of Light" was issued.

In the case of this particular booklet, it does not mention the barcodes at all. It is the clearest distinguishing feature for at least one of the three listed editions of this booklet.

I'll join that society also.
I lost it very early.

Perhaps we can forgive the editors, are not they reliant on the Philatelist, reporting and listing new issues?
And, in turn the relationship, he / she has with the printer/s.