Pair Of 2 Cent Washington Perforated 12 Horizontal.

Hi. Your opinion on this pair of 2 cents, which seems to me to be 1 type. What do you think, represents the 129 catalog of scott? Thank you.

Looks like a used pair of Scott 319g booklet stamps to me. Negligible value.

Sorry I forgot possible the 321 A129? If I am not misunderstood, it should be a 12 perforated horizontal pair?

I ask the pair used because it does not report the value?

You do not have Scott 321. You have a pair of used booklet stamps from Scott 319g. Notice how your stamps are perforated on THREE sides. Scott 321 is a VERY rare and valuable item and that is not what you have. Scott 321 is a coil stamp. You do not have a coil stamp. You have a pair of used booklet stamps.

Just because an item is unpriced does not mean it has a high value or a negligible value.

Unpriced is unpriced, and requires additional explanation on a case by case basis.

Scott 319 in all its sheet and booklet variants, paid the basic 2 cent letter rate of the day. By far, most of these stamps were used as singles. In this case, finding a booklet pair like this is considerably more challenging than finding a pair from a sheet. Try it!

Although Scott has not chosen to give used booklet singles and partial-pane multiples of this era their proper listing/pricing respect, they deserve some premium from a scarcity standpoint alone. The price of full used panes certainly points in this direction. I have been salting these away for a while and think I will be rewarded nicely some day by Scott.

Value? Considering the average centering and fold along the center perfortions, maybe $1 for the pair. It has considerable learning value also.