I Was Wondering Is It A Franklin 385 Double Coil Stamp?

Hello Everyone:
I hope everyone is ready for the holidays.
I came across these stamps and looked everywhere on the internet and could not find this stamp doubled like this.It does look coiled and I do see paint on the back of the stamp.
I was wondering if any one has seen this stamp doubled like this and if does have more value than the other double stamps I have seen.
The funny thing I guess I don't know what kind of double makes a double.
From the top or the side? Anyway here are some pictures.Also I want to add these stamps came off the same envelope.
they were separated like this except for the one pair .
Another answer is it may not be a 385.
Thanks for looking.

331 booklet stamps.

Thank You Rogdcam
That was fast

Thank you Rogdcam again ;
Now what is a contemporaneous cancel that's what a 331a has?
I don't know if it matters ,I do see some crazy marks on the edges of these stamps one looks like a date and one looks like a letter or number ,very light markings not like a cancel.
More like a transfer.They are on the bottom left side .

Do you still have the envelope these stamps came from? The envelope itself would provide useful information that may answer your question.
Often, it is best to leave stamps on a cover - postal history can be very informative and rewarding.

Scott 331a, the full booklet pane of 6 stamps, like other booklet panes of this era, is valued higher by Scott than its unused equivalent. To deserve this value, Scott notes that a used pane must have a "contemporaneous" cancel, that is one from the immediate time period of issue, NOT one a decade of more later likely from a philatelic use.
Your stamps are not a full booklet pane, nor do they appear to have a clear identifiable cancel to style or city or date as near as I can tell. At present neither does Scott provide a value for less-than-pane multiples or singles from booklets, even though identifiable. Subsequently, there is only a modest market.
It is unfortunate these are no longer on the original cover.

Thank you John and orstampman;
I need to clarify a little about these stamps there was no full cover only cut off from the cover.
It looked to be no cancel marking on the paper .But I want to check the stamp out closer maybe I could see something and try to decode it.Like I said there looked to be numbers on the stamp.

I really need help in finding that web site that helps in rendering
the pictures by subtracting elements of color or adding .I forgot where to find it I thought it was in the Philatelic Society tool page.Anyway here are some pic's

I think you are talking about Retroreveal?

http://retroreveal.org/

Thank You Partime;
I tried to render these stamps with Retroreveal and this is what I got not like I thought I would get, but it was something.
The top one looks like a 8 and 9
The bottom looks like 1812 .

1912

Hello again ;
I was really convinced this stamp was a 331 booklet stamp and was hoping it was .
Because the cut margins were right .But what I don't know is why the watermark is a single line watermark and the 331 is a double line watermark in the book?Am I missing something ,could there be other single watermark 331 booklet stamps also. The year on my stamp is confusing to ,1912 "3" or "4" years different s .Which could be explained .
Here are some pictures of the watermark .
Let me know what you think.

331 has a double line watermark.
374 has a single line watermark.
Everything that has been said so far about 331 applies to 374 as well.

Thank You John that's what I was looking for.