Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Admiral 106A Booklet Panes Diff Shades &

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 738Next Topic  
Valued Member

United Kingdom
182 Posts
Posted 02/05/2022   07:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Rfw125 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I have 2 Admiral booklet panes 106a that are different shades and appear to have two different colour papers, the darker shade is in whiter paper and the lighter shade is on the more yellow paper.
Is it the paper or is it the gum ?
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
501 Posts
Posted 02/05/2022   08:59 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Casey Magoo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
182 Posts
Posted 02/05/2022   10:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rfw125 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Whoops forgot to put pictures on..sorry

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
725 Posts
Posted 02/05/2022   12:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add watermark to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It appears you have both wet and dry printing process stamps here. I quote THE ADMIRAL ISSUE OF CANADA by George C. Marler page 35, "As the dry process eliminates much shrinkage which occurs during the drying of the paper after it has received the impression of the plate and has been gummed, stamps printed by the dry process are not only wider but visibly wider. With vertical wove paper, such as was used for the post-office sheets and rolls and for later booklet panes, the shrinkage occurs across the grain or horizontally, with the result that stamps printed by the wet process are narrow compared to those printed from the dry process which are wide. The early booklet panes were printed on horizontal wove, that is to say, with the grain of the paper running across the stamp, so that shrinkage was of the length of the stamp giving it a "squat" appearance."

Mike
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by watermark - 02/05/2022 12:25 pm
Valued Member
United Kingdom
182 Posts
Posted 02/05/2022   1:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rfw125 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi, Mike…thanks for response. I've only got the Unitrade Catalogue as reference….106aiii mentions Squat printing.
Only the reference table mentions wet and dry printing and according to this table there where no dry printing on 106a. However the text underneath the table, which is similar to what you have quoted mentions that dry printing appears embossed, so which of these, if any , would you say was dry printing. Again thanks for response.
Robert
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
725 Posts
Posted 02/05/2022   2:22 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add watermark to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The early booklet panes were printed on horizontal wove paper and shrank vertically.
Stamps being short and wide. The lower booklet in your image. Unitrade 106av.

The other booklet is probably printed on vertical wove paper which shrank horizontally. Stamps appearing tall and narrow. The top booklet in your image. Unitrade 106a.

I suspect both are wet printing but can't be certain as I can not tell if there is embossing (not visible in the image provided).

Welcome others to comment here.

Mike
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by watermark - 02/05/2022 2:35 pm
Valued Member
United Kingdom
182 Posts
Posted 02/05/2022   5:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rfw125 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Many thanks again Mike, only just getting into different papers so all help is gratefully received

Robert
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 738Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05