| Author |
Replies: 38 / Views: 2,646 |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
I'm hoping that someone can positively identify this postmark. Not matching any Victoria postmark that I know of, it appears to be a barred numeral type with an N above 28. Maybe a British cancellation? 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3282 Posts |
|
|
Hi fairdinkumstamps,
I'm pretty sure this is an Indian cancellation.
I'll try to get some more information for you!
EDIT: I think it's a Bombay cancellation, used in the early 1870s. Hopefully someone can give us some more details. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Bobby De La Rue - 03/25/2022 12:01 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
975 Posts |
|
|
I would assume posted on board a ship and cancelled on arrival at the next port of call. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
177 Posts |
|
|
Maybe this suggestion is unlikely but could the "N" be an "M" and represent the number 1000. Quite a few have MC (1100) with a standard number underneath. This is using Roman numerals with standard numbers. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
I went through 60 pages of 'Early Indian Cancellations, 1855-1884' in Robson Lowe's Encyclopedia of British Empire Postage Stamps, The Empire in Asia and, I'm not going to say it's not there, but, I didn't see it there. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
439 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
439 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Cjd, thank you for checking those Indian postmarks, Bobby De La Rue might have more on why he is leaning towards the Bombay postmarks. Many of the ones I have seen from there have a line between the top letter and the numeral below, which this doesn't appear to have. Maybe there are other types like this. This is an interesting site that shows some of the relevant Indian cancellations: https://www.anglo-indian-affairs.co...ps/pm-15.aspStevieG, my bet would still be on 'N' - it certainly isn't the MC/28 barred numeral cancellation of Childers or the M28 of Strathdownie in the state of Victoria. |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 03/25/2022 9:00 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
 As a worldwide collector, I am going to be very surprised if it is Indian. I have never seen an "N" Oval Barred killer in 20 years. The only N I am aware of is the N-7 Experimental Pmk of Jaipur State (Feudatory) Chomu 1941, and that was the lower inscription of a double ring CDS. However, I believe "N" is the Alpha of the Central Provinces Postal Circle. I have yet to see one. Most barred killers I have seen are Alpha Single letter or RMS Anyone else think there may be other Alpha numeric on the right hand side of N and 28 ? Unsure if has been struck twice, but the bars on the Left hand side appear elongated. A real head scratcher.... |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 03/25/2022 8:31 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2025 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Thank you JF, Nope, looks like just N / 28
Unusual as it seems to have "A ring of Bars" Not the familiar Brit. barred killers.
Something is nagging me, it somehow looks familiar. Perhaps a Western Australian Pmk ? I'll check my notes. Negative, plenty of "ring of bars" and N = Newcastle but nothing similar to here.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 03/25/2022 9:03 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2025 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Back to my original British suggestion, From Billig's Handbook on Postmarks, Volume 9, British Postmarks by F. Hugh Vallancey, (First Edition 1935). London North District from the right time period, lines in between the letter and numerals but special note 'many varieties exist'. Also note that the numbers run from 1 to 28:  |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 03/25/2022 9:17 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
So close, and admittedly the "most-complete" explanation to this point, with specific reference to 28, but I'm not feeling it.
I'll be in the same room with a few more of my resources tomorrow, and I'll do a little more looking. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Cjd - 03/25/2022 9:28 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
I think this is our best bet. (Albeit unusual, in having no separating line/s betwixt N and 28) Also confirmed by Ewen L'Estrange How it arrived on a Victorian stamp, makes for tasty musing. For the record, I checked FERNAU listings, on pmks on printed matter.   |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 03/25/2022 9:45 pm |
|
Replies: 38 / Views: 2,646 |
|