Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

R153 Or R154 Or ? Can't Find "Ir" Black/Dark Blue Scott Number

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,038Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
75 Posts
Posted 06/15/2022   05:09 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add mljespe to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Request assistance (I feel a little silly asking) but I cannot find the Scott number for the pics. The closest I could find was the R153 or R154 red overprints?

Thanks in Advance!

Mitch

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
911 Posts
Posted 06/15/2022   06:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add SPQR to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
RS307 catalog value $175 (2020 edition). Dr. K. & Co. was the provisional overprint by Dr. Kilmer a private die medicine company using the stamps to pay the tax on proprietary medicines
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
75 Posts
Posted 06/15/2022   06:24 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add mljespe to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Wow ... Thank you for the rapid ID! Excellent detail and I was thinking that out of the 100's of IR RED overprints I have ... I did not remember ever seeing a black one. (I don't know if I would have ever found it in the RS.... section.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
867 Posts
Posted 06/15/2022   12:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revenuermd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Interestingly, in Philadelphia, the products of Dr. Kilmer with these "provisionals" created by the company were seized. They were being used because proprietary tax stamps were not available in Binghamton, NY (likewise from the Internal Revenue regional office in Syracuse). The line of reasoning in Philadelphia was that the tax was not paid. The cost of the stamps went to the Post Office, not Internal Revenue. As far as we know Philadelphia was the only area where these stamps were challenged and not accepted. Note that the company used a 1˘ stamp on packages where a #8541;˘ proprietary stamp would have been sufficient; similarly the 2˘ and 3˘ Kilmers also were overpaying the tax, only to the wrong government agency.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Ron Lesher
Valued Member
United States
75 Posts
Posted 06/15/2022   1:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add mljespe to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
revenuermd,
Thank u for also adding to the thread. Quite interesting detail.

I would have "never found" that stamp in my Scott without SQPR and yourself taking the time to not just find it but provide excellent background info too.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10590 Posts
Posted 06/15/2022   5:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Kilmer's are always nice things to find. There is a pamphlet about them, The Case of Dr. Kilmer
An Analysis of the Dr. Kilmer & Co. Provisional Proprietary Revenue Stamps Overprinted on the 1895 Postage Stamps of the United States by Morton Dean Joyce, one of the all time great revenue philatelists.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,038Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05