Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Very Late Use Of De-Monetizedpre-Decimal GB Wilding

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 535Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community

United Kingdom
622 Posts
Posted 10/27/2022   06:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add DavidR to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Morning all, just wondered if anyone had ever seen a late usage such as the Wilding shown in the picture? Pre-decimal stamps were officially de-monetized in Britain on 29th February 1972, so this 4d ultramarine was used over 3 years later! Found whilst sorting a huge pile of (mostly) junk bought many years ago. Bit of a keeper, as an oddity.
Regards
DavidR



*** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
6326 Posts
Posted 10/27/2022   09:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Interesting, although being on a clipping, it offers no evidence that these two stamps were part of the needed or accepted postage for this mail piece. They could have ridden along essentially as Cinderella labels next to the proper postage. One could add these same stamps next to valid postage on an envelope today and then clip them off with the date portion of the postmark.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 10/27/2022 10:02 am
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
6526 Posts
Posted 10/27/2022   09:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NSK to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
John Becker makes a valid point. There is no proof this item was not subject to postage due.

It looks like it was a letter.

The basic 2nd class letter rate had been raised to 5˝p on 17 March 1975. The 4d represented 1.67p. Thus, this item would have been underpaid. That, still, leaves the possibility the 4d was confused with a 4p stamp. The basic 1st class letter rate became 7p. 7˝p would have prepaid carriage at the 1st class rate.

Still a nice item.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
622 Posts
Posted 10/27/2022   10:46 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add DavidR to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks gents. Hadn't considered it could be subject to postage due, having only this small fragment. Can't see the stamp would have been confused for a 4p Machin though!
Regards
DavidR
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 10/27/2022   8:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with John, who explained it eloquently,
I have had mail from the US with a Monaco stamp in amongst the postage, cancelled.

It is a machine canceller, if the CFC had read the Machin, that was all that was needed to pass the cover through the obliterator.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 535Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05