Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

FDC Cachet On A Non-Fdc Cover

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 631Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
94 Posts
Posted 03/01/2023   10:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add papa0802 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
The Virgin Islands FDC of 12/15/1937 was issued solely from Charlotte Amalie, VI:



While DC is often an issuing site the following day, it is not in this case. Yet the below VI cover, lacking the First Day of Issue cancellation, has the VI FDC cachet with a DC PM:


Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts
Posted 03/01/2023   10:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
papa, is there a question here?
The second cover is obviously not an FDC



Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Petert4522 - 03/01/2023 10:45 am
Valued Member
United States
94 Posts
Posted 03/01/2023   12:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add papa0802 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Sorry. The question would be, how/why would DC have a VI FDC cachet when they are not an issuing city, or is this "error" a common occurrence?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts
Posted 03/01/2023   12:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Papa, I think you are overthinking this. Washington DC has no cachets, the sender did. He used an FDC cachet the day after. There is no error here.
The cachet is not usually issued by the US Post Office, but by a cachet maker. They sell them to regular collectors like you and I. We can use these for whatever we feel like


Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
1589 Posts
Posted 03/01/2023   12:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add blcjr to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
"DC" had nothing to do with the production of that cachet. It was just one of many produced by private individuals or companies. This one is a Ralph Dyer cachet (see "Rdyer" at lower right), designated M-42 in the Mellone catalog nomenclature, indicating at least 41 other cachets recognized in the Mellone catalog. While postal authorities in the early decades of the 20th century often produced unique cachets for special events, often rubber stamps, from the 20's onward the more artistic types of cacheted covers, like this one, were privately produced. Sometimes the covers would be sold to subscribers who would get the FDOI postmark on their own, but often private firms produced them also. Dyer became an early producer of hand painted cachets, besides the printed cachet seen on this cover.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1056 Posts
Posted 03/01/2023   1:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ZebraMan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
"2nd day" postmarks from Washington DC from this period are relatively common, with cachet or without. When listed in Scott, they are usually priced at a fraction of the price (like $1.25 versus $10. from the issuing city).
The only oddity here may be, why does Scott list the Washington DC second day cancels for most everything from #772-#795 and then stops right before this one, when the 2nd Day practice still continued and those covers certainly exist in great quantities.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Spain
518 Posts
Posted 03/01/2023   4:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Roberto59 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The acronym FDC means that the envelope itself is an FDC, only it is not official.
I have received unofficial FDC circulated, even two months after the issue date.
Just today I received this with cancellation from FDC from behind.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 631Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05