Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

I Found A 1923 Franklin 1 Cent; Perfs 9.5 X 9.75

Previous Page | Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 98 / Views: 6,064Next Topic
Page: of 7
Valued Member
United States
52 Posts
Posted 09/04/2025   2:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps2025 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I going to re-check the other 250 to see how many are 10's and how many are 9.75's


One poster said the Franklins are 9.75 but rounded up to 10 in the Scott book

Results will decide if 9.75 or 10 wins

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
52 Posts
Posted 09/04/2025   6:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps2025 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Found another stash: all 188 are 11 x 10.5 perf

Scott 632

worthless

found 10 postcards to be checked: all Franklin 1 cent green
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
12569 Posts
Posted 09/04/2025   6:58 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Who would have thought this topic could make it 6 pages and counting. Impressive.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4309 Posts
Posted 09/04/2025   7:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Who would have thought this topic could make it 6 pages and counting. Impressive.


Only a solid four pages if you subtract the face-palm postings.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
52 Posts
Posted 09/04/2025   7:42 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps2025 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Sit tight all


I may have found a verified winner from 1924 on a postcard


Going to the library tomorrow to research Scotts Specialized Catalog

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
52 Posts
Posted 09/04/2025   8:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps2025 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Darn it, could not check for setoff green or black specs on the back since its on cover

perf 11 on all 4 sides

19.25 x 22.0 mm



I used enhanced resolution; lets see how they look

Odds are really against me for a Scott 596
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
52 Posts
Posted 09/04/2025   8:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps2025 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I'll have to really dig in the basement stamp boxes

I may have seen one with Kansas City
Mo on it



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
764 Posts
Posted 09/04/2025   8:44 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Germania to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
perf 11 on all 4 sides
(Buda, Ill.)

Not. 11 x 10.5
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
52 Posts
Posted 09/05/2025   08:55 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps2025 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Germania

Hopefully these 4 pix will come out clear using enhanced option

All 4 sides using the white paper gauge came out dead center 11

Even the black metal gauge created an exact 11 on all 4 sides

I'd like to hear your reply to these pix



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
764 Posts
Posted 09/05/2025   09:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Germania to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
In my reply I meant to write 10.5 x 11. The top and bottom are 10.5, the sides are 11. Here is your image (it would be better if the image were in focus) with the top of the stamp copied, rotated and placed along the side so that the first perforation hole is aligned. As you move down the stamp the holes do not line uo anymore.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
137 Posts
Posted 09/05/2025   09:30 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Jr. Ratfish to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Germania, I respectfully disagree. I think this stamp is a 552 (flat plate, perf. 11, issued 1923, value .25). The rotary press compound perf 11x10.5 (632) was issued in 1927. The postmark shows a 1924 cancellation. Is this a possibility?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Jr. Ratfish - 09/05/2025 09:36 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
764 Posts
Posted 09/05/2025   09:49 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Germania to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Jr. Ratfish - yes, based on the year it would be flat plate, perf 11. The method I used works well with an in-focus scanned image. With an out-of-focus skewed image not so much. Thanks.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
6530 Posts
Posted 09/05/2025   3:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NSK to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Why are we continuing to have post after post with vague pictures taken at angles that show incorrect use of a perforfation gauge that is held at an angle to the stamp and even then shows a shift?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by NSK - 09/05/2025 3:55 pm
Valued Member
United States
52 Posts
Posted 09/05/2025   5:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps2025 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rev

Sorry about some fuzzy pix

I used the metal black gauge for these

All 4 sides show 11 as the exact match



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
52 Posts
Posted 09/05/2025   5:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps2025 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Previous pix were for NSK

sorry
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 7 Previous TopicReplies: 98 / Views: 6,064Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05