| Author |
Replies: 22 / Views: 3,909 |
|
Valued Member
United States
488 Posts |
|
|
hi all again please know that I always appreciate all you guys help i do not know if I ever posted this stamp before i have been told that this stamp was a 279Bc [rose carmine] many years ago this is a mnh stamp i have seen that it would be a very valuable stamp i understand that I would need to get it certified before I would consider selling it the top selvage was attached before and was very lose so I removed it please give me your thoughts thanks as always dan 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2547 Posts |
|
|
Scanner and screen settings make it difficult to see the actual color. The color that I see is a medium carmine. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
488 Posts |
|
|
i just compared the stamp and the photo posted here and there does seem a difference i think that the stamp is much lighter in color
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts |
|
|
The difference is not just a difference in lightness/darkness but a difference in hue. 279Bc has a definite pink color to it. Your scan does not show any hint of pink. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
488 Posts |
|
|
it may be wishful thinking but the stamp does appear to have some pink in it, but I am not sure, [my eyes are not what they used to be] |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2547 Posts |
|
|
Here is a 279Bc  Here is your stamp with the 279Bc inserted for comparison  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
488 Posts |
|
|
thanks for all of your input i just got an email from someone who I am going to send some stamps to who is going to compare to his color chart this stamps color is not as it appears here it seems that I have many color questions about my collection i will tell you all about my finding
i hope you all do not mind all of my questions i have learned long ago that you will not find out things unless you ask
thanks
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
146 Posts |
|
|
I've been looking at this stamp for a while and it definitely looks to be a type IV from the scan not completly sure on the ear dots but every thing else is there the colour to me from the scan looks like a light carmine not Rose colour but if that is the case that just means it's a 279bf not a bc and that is a much rarer stamp |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by razersedge - 12/16/2010 2:16 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
488 Posts |
|
|
i just looked into mt scotts that is from 2007 and only see the 279Bf as a reddish carmine the only big reason that I ask about this stamp is because it was a mnh copy i was trying to adjust the color but it did not show the color better it is I lighter color than shows here
you said it was not common can you tell me what a mnh copy is listed ?
thanks
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2547 Posts |
|
|
The diversity of color on the 2 cent first Bureau issues is unmatched in U.S. philately. They were issued in colors from pink to dark red and lake to vermilion. I have collected over 450 different colors/shades/hues and I still find great subjectivity in color discrimination. With a production run of 8 years and 20-25 billion copies color variation can be a major collection within itself. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
146 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Quote: can you tell me what a mnh copy is listed ? #279Bf is $27.50 for MNH in the 2010 Scott standard WW catalog. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2547 Posts |
|
|
Scott Specialized only lists colors as carmine and reddish carmine. In fact, the carmine shade ranges from light carmine to deep carmine. Edit: Should have specified that these colors are for 279Bf |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Russ - 12/16/2010 3:54 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
146 Posts |
|
|
Just looked on 1847usa and they are showing a pink??
279B 7/6/1899 12 billion double-line Type IV; red, light red, deep red; double transfer; triple transfer; upper right triangle not shaded 279Bc rose carmine 3/30/1899 double-line Type IV; rose carmine, bright carmine rose 279Bd orange red 6/8/1900 D/L horiz. Type IV; pale to dark to deep orange red 279Bd orange red vertical wmk. D/L vert. Type IV; orange red (as 279Bd); the vertical watermark was an error 279B carmine 11/18/1897 double-line Type IV; carmine, reddish carmine 279B pink 12/1/1897 double-line Type IV; pink, bright pink 279B vermilion 2/27/1899 double-line Type IV; vermilion, pale vermilion 279B brownish orange double-line Type IV; brown orange - Type IV
So as I said earlyer it definiently looks like it's a type IV |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by razersedge - 12/16/2010 3:55 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Russ makes an important point.
#279Bf is listed as carmine in both the US standard WW catalog and the US Specialized. However, there is a minor color shade variety listed as reddish carmine in the 2008 US Specialized. This minor color shade variety is NOT assigned a separate minor catalog number. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by khj - 12/16/2010 3:56 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
In the 2008 US Specialized, the carmine and the reddish carmine variety have the same catalog values. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 22 / Views: 3,909 |
|