I thought I'd share a response I got to an inquiry to an
ebay seller. I post on Stampsmarter sometimes, but even more often, I send notes to sellers when I see something that they've described as something better than it really is. I usually get, actually very nice responses- like "thanks for your help".
I'll probably get some comments that I was a bit harsh here, and I'll admit after reading it that I may have come off like a jerk-- but in no way deserved what came back to me. Bottom line, is that he is describing a lot of classic US stamps as SOUND, when they aren't, and this one isn't sound in any way-- but I offered to buy it from him, if it didn't sell, and it didn't.
Here is a link to the stamp:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/121828857754Here is what I sent him:
Dear cwsdenver,
This stamp is plate position 100L8, bottom right corner of the left half of the plate. I'm only interested in it because of the position because I plate this issue. It isn't anywhere near sound as described, with some severe perf faults on the lower left. I can offer you $15 for it if it doesn't sell. Thanks,
- ray_mac
He could have ignored me, and could've said "no", and could have said "no, and you're wrong", or even "no, a__hol_", but this is what he said:
Dear ray_mac,
Perf 15 1/2 stamps are exempted from the normal grading standards, as any "expert" should know. It is "sound" because it has no tears, creases, bends, wrinkles, or any other defects other than what it received when it was cancelled or seperated into a single stamp at the Post Office.
I truly hate pin-headed jerk stamp collectors like you. This stamp hobby has been decreasing for 30 years and eventually you will all be dead along with the stamps you so much treasure!- cwsdenver
My initial reaction was shock, and then I thought I'd say something like: "Well, would you take $15.25 for it instead?".
Listen, all I did was say it isn't sound. And if it doesn't sell, I'll offer you a lower price for it. Didn't really say anything wrong, except he really obviously didn't like the fact that someone doesn't think it was sound.......
And, it's obvious that he never sent a stamp to Bill Weiss that he thought was "Sound", and got a cert back with a "tiny corner perf crease, otherwise sound".
Thought I'd share. Again, if you think I was a little rough on the edges, I can accept that, but my main purpose here was showing that the guy is mis-describing his stamps, and I guess now I'm a pin-headed jerk stamp collector, and this guy thinks I should die.
If he's on this board, I'd truly invite him to tell his side.....
Thanks for listening....Ray