Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

#349 Coil Perfs

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,721Next Topic  
Valued Member
324 Posts
Posted 12/23/2015   3:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add lukusw to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
The subject of fake or altered perfs comes up frequently here, and I've noticed that pretty much any stamp you put up with a question of reperf, fake perf, or genuineness of the stamp will find at least one poster stating that the perfs look suspect or clearly altered. On that note, I wanted to share the following #349 from the Philatelic Foundation's database of certifications (cert#523111). This one was certified GENUINE with no comment on the crazy variety of perfs. Just another example that "odd-looking" doesn't always equal "fake" (unless, of course, you think that the cert is wrong). Oh, and it was graded 95.

All comments welcome.

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
628 Posts
Posted 12/23/2015   4:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jim6092252 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I'm not sure about the grade of 95 but it does have nice big borders
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2423 Posts
Posted 12/23/2015   4:55 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add KGB to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I`ve wondered, too, about how one goes about determining if a stamp`s perfs have been altered while the evidence is simply 'irregularities.' Perhaps if I knew more about the perf machine of the time period I could distinguish between what`s nice and sharp or genuine but cut with dull edges. (After all, doesn`t everything get dull with age? Present company excluded, of course.)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by KGB - 12/23/2015 4:56 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
12330 Posts
Posted 12/23/2015   5:10 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Clark said in the other current thread...


Quote:
Rather than learning coil identification by rote, start with the business problem. The Bureau was faced with production bottlenecks, quality issues and increasing demand for stamps. . Changes in watermark, perforations and ultimately the development of the rotary press all related to the need to print larger quantities of better stamps at a lower cost. Coils were developed in response to a desire to support high speed affixing machines and stamp vending machines. Initially coils had to be cut up from sheets of stamps perforated in one direction. Imperforate coils were also made available. Because stamp collectors did not take coils seriously until the changeover to perf 8 1/2, few were saved.

Substantial quantities of coils with fake perforations were sold to dealers (and collectors) even before World War II. Until Kiusalas produced the US Specialty Gauge in the late 1960s, fake perforations were generally not exactly the same gauge as genuine perforations. If imperforate coils were not available, like for the 4 and 5 cent horizontal coils, edges had to be cut by hand and were rarely parallel enough to be credible. As production processes changed, the characteristics of the coil edges changed. (The Micarelli Guide lists stamps that can be altered to resemble a coil or scarce perforation variety.) With very limited exceptions, genuine coil edges must be parallel. When comparing edges, the same stamp should be compared top to bottom. (When comparing perforations, a different stamp should be used.)


Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,721Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05