Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Centering Questions/ Short Perfs

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,689Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1033 Posts
Posted 01/30/2016   10:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add rgstamp to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I was wondering at what point a short perf detracts from a grade of a stamp.

please take a look at stamps below-- I recently picked these out of a large collection. they are from left to right (Scott 418, 465,468, 663) I think

they aren't tremendously valuable but very attractive. the best centered one (to my eye!) is the 465 (second stamp from left). However, it has two shortish perfs at top.

663 Kansas overprint has a shortish perf at top as well. (mint vlh)

Any comments on the effect of the perfs on a grade! Any thoughts if these guys would hit 95+ grades from PSE?



Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2545 Posts
Posted 01/30/2016   11:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chasa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
my opinion: no detraction at all for these, but I have never figured out how to tell 90 from 95 from 100 grades.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1096 Posts
Posted 01/31/2016   01:27 am  Show Profile Check orstampman's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add orstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Agree that the 4c (465) has the best centering, and although there are a couple short-ish perforations at top, I think this still would easily be at least a 95 if a completely sound condition stamp.

The others aren't too bad either, but may be not quite 95 material.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6661 Posts
Posted 01/31/2016   06:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stallzer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Don't know about a numerical grade but for me personally I'd purchase stamps of that quality any day. I don't see a decrease in value either.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1033 Posts
Posted 01/31/2016   06:32 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rgstamp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I guess my question is what is definition of "nibbed" perf, "shorter" perf, short" perf, "pulled" perf, etc?

I thought I read a short perf affects grade if it is less than 50 percent of normal size perf? What size defines normal perf or is it defined by 50 % of surrounding acceptable peforations?

Or perhaps this is all nonsense unscientific subjective exercise. Guy grading your stamps may be having a great day or miserable because wife just slept with the plumber.

On 4c stamp above there are two shorter perfs at top but relative to other perfs at top, they don't look so bad and may not affect grade. However relative to left side perfs, they are shorter and perhaps would bring down a grade???




Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1033 Posts
Posted 01/31/2016   3:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rgstamp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
comments on short perf at bottom of this one.

this mint stamp looks awesome to me -- the impression is so sharp! trace of hinge on back.

only thing I see is "nib" or short perf on bottom about 8th perf from left. Would that get called out on a certificate? Would it detract from grade? Do any of sides look like perf added?



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1271 Posts
Posted 01/31/2016   5:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Download the PDF file and read through it. It does discuss short perfs. This may answer your question.

http://gradingmatters.com/all-about-grading.html
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1545 Posts
Posted 01/31/2016   8:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I Brake For Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The PSE Guide to Grading and Expertizing United States Stamps consider a "short or nibbed perf" as a "minor fault". If I considered the centering of this stamp to be XF-S, with no faults it would have an initial score of 95. With a single "minor fault" the score would be reduced to 80 which would be a stamp of VF condition.


-IBFS
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
All science is either Physics or Stamp Collecting. -- Ernest Rutherford
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1033 Posts
Posted 01/31/2016   8:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rgstamp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think this 50c Columbian stamp, faultless, with this centering would grade at best 90. But with short perf it would go down to 75? That is my concern. Not worth $$$ to have graded. Will enjoy it as is!

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1271 Posts
Posted 01/31/2016   9:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I believe multiple nibbed or short perfs. is considered a major fault.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,689Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.35 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05