| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,596 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
196 Posts |
|
|
Just going by this scan, how would you describe the condition of this stamp? (There is a hinge on back) Thanks. 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts |
|
|
To me it would be a space filler - the perforations seem to leave a lot to be desired. Also something going on in the bottom left corner.
Peter |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
196 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1096 Posts |
|
|
It has F-VF centering, lightly soiled, a crease at upper left corner, perforation thin at upper right, scuff at lower left corner, some short perforations, BUT a beautiful light red cross-roads fancy cancel. It has faults, but I wouldn't call it a space filler. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
344 Posts |
|
|
"Spacefiller" is a horrible term and I would gladly ban it from philatelic parlance.
This stamp is solidly Very Fine Condition, a term with well defined expectations. It most definitely has Faults - perf issues on all sides, a scuff/tear spot at LL, what appears to be a thin at top and it could use a gentle bath!
I would add this to my personal collection in a heartbeat, lacking a red crossroads of this type on the 12c Bamknote.
I would add this to my great-grandfather's collection even faster. He was not a wealthy man, and this fits exactly into the "faulty" condition he collected. In some of the 19th-C series, my VF+ collection is less complete than what has become my "family legacy" collection! I continue to add to this collection, and in the traditional condition. Have dealers looked at me funny when asking for this material? Not after I explain what I am doing and why.
Bottom line. This is nowhere near a full SCV stamp. I would be looking to pay no more than 15% SCV. Anyone who tells you that this has no value is wrong.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1847 Posts |
|
|
Is that a New York Foreign Mail cancel? Kirke, in the May 2016 Chronicle of the US Philatelics Classic Society, provides a new categorization of the NYFM cancels but shows this negative cross used in 1863, which is too early for Scott 151 (1870).
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
6525 Posts |
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
344 Posts |
|
|
Yes, this is NYFM. It will take time for collectors to integrate Nick Kirke's new approach towards these cancels. This type of basic "fancy" is going to have a much longer service period than previously thought. Simple to maintain. Simple to reproduce. Why wouldn't it be around for a decade? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
196 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,596 |
|