| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 4,075 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
333 Posts |
|
|
Howdy-Doody to you all!! I'm having trouble tracking these stamps down in my Scott. I curse my lazy-eye sometimes because when I'm viewing 2 pages at the same time I tend to overlook things. I put my eye-patch on over my lazy-eye and tried one eyeing my Scott book and still had no luck locating them. I guess I could try covering up my good eye and trying to locate them with my lazy-eye. Hmmm...  I would appreciate anybody here who could help me with some info regarding the ID, value, etc. Thanks, Lucky
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Sharjah Appendix stamp/s Considered a Cinderella No CV, or at best minimal, seen in multitudes of cheap stock books at auction. 1972 Sharjah (or someone claiming to represent them) printed hundreds of these labels on every conceivable topic. Usually found in catalogues back of book with minimal listing details eg 1972 Butterflies (then their values) PS: I think if you look, or scan up close, you will find they couldn't be bothered to even cancel the labels, they printed the cancellation as well  They are listed here: http://www.ohmygosh.on.ca/stamps/sh.../sharj72.htm |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 11/22/2010 11:49 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
333 Posts |
|
|
If they are considered a Cinderella, why is there a postmark on it and how can a Postal Airmail stamp be classified as a Cinderella? Also, can you explain what you mean by "Appendix"?
I appreciate you taking the time to help me with this Rod222.
Lucky |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Hi Lucky, 1. The postmark is a subterfuge, it is not a cancel, it is an integral part of the printed sheet, a deception. Example-The signature on a forged banknote- It remains valueless because the banknote is not genuine. Cinderella=no genuine postal use.
Appendix stamps: A Stanley Gibbons reference to a group of stamps from a country, where actual postal use is not confirmed, the stamp has a doubtful heritage, so they lump them together at the back of that country's listings, without dedicated catalogue numbers
Hope my weak attempt at explanation is helpful. :)
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
BTW Lucky, it is OK to collect these labels...I do  (you get funny looks when you buy them at auction though) Here are appendix of sharjah as shown in gibbons Note..no catalogue numbers  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
333 Posts |
|
|
Wholly Smokes rod!! I wet my finger and tried to smudge or smear the ink on the cancel and you are right about them printing the cancel when they printed the stamp. I checked out the site link as well. I came across these in some stamps that someone gave me & I thought they were real pretty. You burst my bubble with your info but at least you were gentle about it. Thanks for you help.  Lucky |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
 we don't want to scare the gals off, now do we, These sorts of labels are still being produced today, Australia produces genuine stamps with printed cancellations Lucky, to use as "shop props" displays, promotions etc etc. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
333 Posts |
|
|
Quote:
we don't want to scare the gals off, now do we,
Well, I'm a gal who don't scare easy (and can run real fast when I do)  Lucky |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Finland
753 Posts |
|
|
Rod, I think You have this one wrong... According to Michel Gulf States catalog, the 1972 m/s has has only one stamp with face value of 4 Rials (not four stamps of 1 rials); and the sheets size should be 78x98mm (whereas the displayed sheet is pretty close to a square). Secondly... AFAIK, most (if not all) Sharjah items postmarked (CTO) Dec 1972 (or later) are unissued remainders. These are basically stamps that the printers had the intend to issue, but due to birth of United Arab Emirates were too late. As these have no official status, none of the postage stamp catalogs (including Michel too) do not list these... A somewhat similar CTO-cancelled remainder sheet can be seen on my blog: http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/...istory-2.php ; these are very plenty / easy to find. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| Edited by scb - 11/23/2010 01:32 am |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Hello scb,
with respect, I strongly disagree with your entire suggestion.
1. That is not a minisheet, it is simply a block of 4 labels of 1rl. 2. Unnissued remainders?..absolutely no way they are labels, printed in the US or Great Britain and have a murky involvement with a board member of Stanley Gibbons IIRC. The weblink I cannot vouch for, I do not know who created it, or their source. These "dune" stamps were a vast scam.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
578 Posts |
|
|
Most of these stamps were printed in Lebanon. A firm named Baroody Stamp Company, of Beirut, owned by Michel Stephan, produced these issues. Baroody Stamp Company was responsible for most of the notorious Sand Dunes stamp releases. Stephan retained a large stock of Sand Dunes stamps and continued faking errors for many years after 1972. Michel Stephan was assisted by a business partner, Ed Mosden (Ezzet Moshi), who produced many of the Kennedy memorials (one South Arabian emission of which is being debated on another thread). Mosden produced a Kennedy memorial issue for the Philippines. Mosden is of interest to me because he produced the St. Lucia Statehood overprints. Here is a rare cover franked with a stamp overprinted by Mosden which was not available in St. Lucia. One of two covers to come onto the market in the last 15 years:  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1865 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
333 Posts |
|
|
This is a scan of the front of the glassine envelope they were in.  Lucky |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 4,075 |
|