| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 6,703 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
333 Posts |
|
|
I'm having trouble locating this set of 5 stamps. I think they are from 1967. Any help would be appreciated.  Lucky
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
An Aden Protectorate State : 1955 - 1967
Spelt in Gibbons with a "Q" Qu'aiti state in Hadhramaut
Your set, I believe, are an "Appendix set" that is, issued in excess of postal needs
1967 Space Research Values : 10,25,35,50,75f, Air 100,250f
The national liberation fron took control of Qu'aiti state in Hadhramaut 17th sept 1967
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2574 Posts |
|
|
Lucky This set was issued in 1967. It's not listed in Scott. So it's never been significally postally used. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
333 Posts |
|
|
These stamps are part of a box of stamps that my Mail Lady gave me. A few weeks ago I was chitt-chatting with her out at the mail box and I mentioned to her that I collect stamps. She told me that she had saved some stamps during her postal career but just wasn't into it and said she would give me what she had collected. A couple days later I went to get the mail & I came close to peeing my pants when I saw the box of stamps sitting in the mailbox for me. rod222 As usual you are a wealth of information. timbres667 I'm a little bit confused when you say it's never been significantly postally used.  These 5 have been postally used... Lucky |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
Canada
6750 Posts |
|
|
Nope, not postal use. Timbres667 is correct.
The cancels are what is called cancelled-to-order or CTO, printed (or sometimes hand stamped) on stamps that were printed just to sell to collectors and not to be used in the regular postal system.
You can tell by the regular spacing of he cancels, every one is on the same area or at least a corner, and it is the same date, a bit hard to tell on these.
Anything that may be from certain countries (a lot of desert Arabic (dunes) counties did this and perhaps still do). If it looks too good to be true, it probably is.
Countries even now are cancelling stamps to-order and for sale to collectors that you can find these kind of stamps with a perfect cancel almost and other postally used stamps with not so nice cancels. Some collectors prefer the nice-looking cancels rather than the actual town and city cancels.
When you see a bunch of these together you will be able to tell better. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts |
|
|
This is the first time I've seen a set inscribed "Kathiri State in Hadhramaut". It is is the Kathiri sultan in the corner, and the Kathiri state was in the Hadhramaut region of South Arabia, but the regularly issued stamps were inscribed "Kathiri State of Seiyun" or similar. I don't see this set listed in the SG Appendix so maybe it was unauthorised or I've missed it. The Qu'aiti and Mahra sultanates were neighbouring states. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
333 Posts |
|
|
Puzzler, Thanks for explaining what Timbres667 was trying to tell me. I appreciate all the info (and patience) that people give me here.
Lucky |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Finland
753 Posts |
|
|
These are indeed Kathiri state of Seiyun stamps. According to Michel Gulf States catalog, the new inscription "Kathiri State in Hadhramaut" was taken into use on stamps in 1967 (and used till the end of state in 1968).
For the displayed set... A complete set would contain 7 stamps + 2 miniature sheets; all have been issued both as perf and imperf versions. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
333 Posts |
|
|
The cancel marks do show the letters yun on a couple of them. Could that be the tail end of Seiyun?
Lucky |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote: These are indeed Kathiri state of Seiyun stamps Indeed not. They represent two periods in the influence of the Kathiri's. The Kathiri's once ruled the most part of Hadhramut, but due to influence of the Qu'aiti's they were eventually resticted to a small enclave of hadhramut with their capital at Seiyun Wiki should elaborate for you. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts |
|
|
Hi Rod, There is indeed a useful article on the Kathiri state in Wikipedia including a good map of the states at the time of the South Arabian protectorate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KathiriAs you mentioned the period of Kathiri dominance was much earlier in the 19th century but there was still a significant amount of Kathiri territory in the 1960's inland from Seiyun. It seems reasonable that the some stamps of the Kathiri state should have referred to being "in" Hadhramaut just as the Qu'aiti issues had changed from being "of" Shihr and Mukalla to "in" Hadhramaut. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 6,703 |
|