Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Boston, Mass. Sta. No. 7

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 2,065Next Topic  
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 01/25/2015   4:18 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wt1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Has anyone ever seen this postmark before? It was applied to the reverse of a Registered Mail Cover from 1945. I've never heard of a "Sta. No. 7" in Boston (most were identified with letters rather than numbers back in the day as in "Sta. A"). I was wondering where this Station may have been located. Could it have been a special Station in place only during the war years?

Send note to Staff
Edited by wt1 - 01/25/2015 4:22 pm

Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 01/26/2015   05:33 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There is a fire station No. 7 in Boston Mass. Could that be a clue perhaps?

Also, I don't know if this would be of any help or not but the original layout of that yard is just enormous, so it could be a passenger platform or some other part of the yard; perhaps an out-building or similar? just maybe it could even be an R.P.O. hand-stamp?
Anyway, Here is a map that illustrates what I mean. I couldn't find a thing on the inter-web but just this stuff. Sorry I couldn't be of more help.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
720 Posts
Posted 01/26/2015   07:19 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Glenn Estus to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I Love Stamps: What is the inter-web?

WT1: What is the address of the recipient of the letter? The station was probable in the general neighborhood of the address.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts
Posted 01/26/2015   4:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add eligies to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The General Post Office (GPO) located in the McCormick Court Building on the Milk Street, Congress Street block had numerous delivery codes, (01-10 now 02101- 02110+). The GPO also had multiple (largest in city of Boston) service counters. The Station 7 may relate to the service station the piece was received at when mailed.???
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 01/27/2015   05:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Just a corny word for internet Glenn.

Now that seems like helpful info eligies!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by I_Love_Stamps - 01/27/2015 05:17 am
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 01/27/2015   11:10 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
WT1: What is the address of the recipient of the letter? The station was probable in the general neighborhood of the address.


Both addresses (sender and receiver) were located in Boston. The postmark shown in the above example was dated the day before the other (which reads "Boston, Mass., Postal Station A") so I assume "Postal Station A" refers to the location where the cover was sent to.

On the other hand, the "Boston, Mass. Sta. No. 7" postmark was probably from the post office where the sender entered the item into the mail. The return address of the sender was a law office that had been located at "Cornhill, Boston". An internet check reveals that Cornhill no longer exists but is now part of Government Center, so I suspect the postmark may have involved a Post Office station once located in the old Scollay Square area:


Quote:
Cornhill, along with Scollay Square, was destroyed during the construction of Boston's Government Center during the city's 1960s-era Urban Renewal Scheme. Initially, Government Center was lauded as "a model of how urban renewal, when imaginatively conceived and carried out, can bring new vitality and beauty to a city". Government Center even captured a special commendation from the American Institute of Architects in 1972. Today, the aesthetic merit of the area is assigned, at best, mixed values. Many view the area as a brutalist 'brick desert' in the heart of what was once one of Boston's most picturesque Victorian neighborhoods.


http://forgottennewengland.com/2012...ment-center/

Incidentally, I did pickup a couple of references in the Postal Bulletin (dated 1905 and 1906) suggesting that the Postmaster General ordered that post offices establish "numbered stations" for the transaction of money order and registry business. Since the postmark shown was on a registered mail cover, I suspect that perhaps Station No. 7 may have been the post office where the item was received for mailing.

That's the most I've come up with to date.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by wt1 - 01/27/2015 11:11 am
Pillar Of The Community
6328 Posts
Posted 01/27/2015   1:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply




Boston is an excellent city for studying postal technology and postal history - especially machine cancels, zones, etc.

Here is a scan from page 243 of the July 1945 Postal Guide listing the Boston branches and stations. The unscanned 3rd column goes up to station 224, with quite a few missing numbers. Clearly too many stations for alphabet letters. (Many modest sized towns switched back and forth among letters, numbers, and names.)

Looking earlier, the 1907 Postal Guide lists 128 numbered stations in Boston, all of which were operating AND it give their addresses. Station 7 (then) was at Norfolk & Corbett Streets - no idea if they renumbered them or not, so this may not be correct for 1945.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 2,065Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.15 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05