Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

USPS To Phase Out All Water Activated Gum (Wag) Stamps

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 4,497Next Topic  
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 03/03/2015   2:32 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wt1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
The USPS has issued a plan to phase out all WAG stamps in favor of PSA stamps, although existing WAG stamps will be sold until the supply is exhausted.

Linn's Stamp News has summarized this here:

http://www.linns.com/news/breaking-...ick-US-stamp

What's particularly striking is the fact that:


Quote:
...according to the Postal Service, which claims that the base cost of printing stamps with moisture-activated adhesive is now 115 percent greater than self-adhesives. That means the cost of creating a lick-and-stick stamp is more than double that of a self-adhesive.

The problem, according to the USPS, is that "water activated paper is only available through international channels," adding to the production cost and slowing down production as stamp printers wait for the special imported paper to arrive.


If you wish to view the 6-slide USPS Power Point Presentation on the subject, it can be found here:

https://ribbs.usps.gov/mtac/documen...pensessions/

Send note to Staff
Edited by wt1 - 03/03/2015 2:35 pm

Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
3046 Posts
Posted 03/03/2015   4:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add apastuszak to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The true end of an era...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Free Ukrainian Stamp Album and modified Mystic Stamp Album Pages - http://www.stamphacks.com
Ukrainian Philatelic and Numismatic Society Member #1212: http://www.upns.org
Eire Philatelic Association Member #2869: http://www.eirephilatelicassoc.org/
Valued Member
13 Posts
Posted 03/03/2015   6:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add scalp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Quote:
...according to the Postal Service, which claims that the base cost of printing stamps with moisture-activated adhesive is now 115 percent greater than self-adhesives. That means the cost of creating a lick-and-stick stamp is more than double that of a self-adhesive.

The problem, according to the USPS, is that "water activated paper is only available through international channels," adding to the production cost and slowing down production as stamp printers wait for the special imported paper to arrive.



this seems dumb to me...don't we think the USPS could have paper made in the USA just as the govt has special paper made for US currency?

just shows that USPS cares nothing about the stamp collector except to get their money the easiest way (inverted jenny "lottery")
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
13 Posts
Posted 03/03/2015   6:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add scalp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
BTW.....since I collect stamps and covers for my own enjoyment regardless of cost or future resale considerations....I will continue to collect "old" water activated stamps, and not collect the new self adhesive types generally...if that makes me a slimeball then so be it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1868 Posts
Posted 03/03/2015   6:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cjpalermo1964 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Utter doublespeak. The USPS essentially said, in statements quoted in a separate thread on SCF relating to the withdrawal of the "Active Kids" issue--the one showing a skateboarder with no helmet, etc.--that the withdrawal and destruction of millions of stamps was no big deal because the raw material cost was so low. Something like $39,000 in paper and printing was represented in millions of stamps. So even if gummed stamps cost 1.15X that, we are talking about low amounts of absolute dollars. There must be another reason - low consumer demand, storage issues, etc., or perhaps they just don't want to be bothered, they feel they have converted the US public to self-stick and it's easier to have a single chain of supply to make a single type of product.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 4,497Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.15 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05