Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Paiid 3 Cancel And Damaged Stamp Question?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,941Next Topic  
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 03/06/2015   04:40 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
OK I WAS BROWSING Jim Fortes postal history site this morning and notices a cover from Luthersburg (next town over from Clearfield, PA.) and noticed it has a PAID 3 cancel and a beat-up Scott #114. It also looks like a stamp either fell off or may have been replaced? What's going on with this? Is the postal rate corrected or changed or is it just a beat up cover? Thank you.

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
1096 Posts
Posted 03/06/2015   04:53 am  Show Profile Check orstampman's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add orstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It looks the stamp originated on the cover, but is just really beat up!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 03/06/2015   04:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yeah that's what I thought. Thank you though.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1807 Posts
Posted 03/06/2015   07:47 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dudley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Possibly the stamp got beat up in an attempt to remove it by simply peeling it off, which would account for what appear to be the outlines of where a stamp once was.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
720 Posts
Posted 03/06/2015   4:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Glenn Estus to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It was not unusual for handstamps such as "PAID 3" which were used between 1851 and 1855 to be used as a cancelled for many years later. I've seen examples routinely used on cover from the 1870s and 1880s
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7239 Posts
Posted 03/06/2015   4:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The pattern of the paper excision on the bottom edge and going into the right corner looks like it was done by a paper and glue eating varmint. The cancellation, and the perf tip marks (glue spots) where the rest of the stamp would have been, give the impression that this stamp originated on the cover.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1115 Posts
Posted 03/06/2015   5:19 pm  Show Profile Check docgfd's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add docgfd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Postmaster General Joseph Holt's order of July 23, 1860 required the use of a separate killer to cancel stamps and banned the used of date stamps for that purpose. Many smaller post offices had to buy their own cancelling devices so its not unusual to see handstamps such as the 'paid 3 in circle,' left over from the stampless era, continue to be used to save the expense of purchasing a new canceller. Either that, or the clerk just grabbed what was handy and whacked away.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1179 Posts
Posted 03/06/2015   11:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Hal to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The upper-right corner of the stamp was missing when the cover was mailed; the "PAID" cancel ties the stamp correctly to the cover. However the rest of the damage was caused by age. Look carefully and you'll see gum residue and perforation outlines on the side and bottom. The stamp was printed about 1869 -- the stamp is 146 years old-- think about the gum and how and where the cover was stored -- both took their toll -- the stamp simply disintegrated based on age. It was bumped, bent, caught on something.

Have you ever seen or noticed mucilage crackling or crazing on the back of your stamps? Well, what is happening to your stamps now…the gum is drying out --shrinking at a faster rate than the paper--and eventually the stress-tension differences and dryness will cause the the stamp to crack and fracture. The paper simply disintegrates. This is what has happen on the left, on the bottom and the corner of this stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,941Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.18 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05