Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Quebec Unemployement Insurance Stamp

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 37 / Views: 7,080Next Topic
Page: of 3
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   11:48 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wert to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hi guys...Just wanted to share this Quebec Scott # QU3...Got it in a junk pile of stamps I picked up at a local auction last night...Never seen one before and not sure about the year of issue and the funny "7Z" cancel on the stamp.

Robert


Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
7081 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   12:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
In what has to be one of the most inspired pairings in revenue stamp history, these were affixed to liquor-bottle wrappers to collect a tax for the benefit of the unemployed.

Reminds me of the old joke that alarm clocks with a Snooze feature should be packaged with a bottle of tequila and a stack of unemployment applications.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
2013 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   12:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add area66 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
we have a website for Canadian revenu stamps

http://www.canadarevenuestamps.com/...ef+Tax+stamp

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by area66 - 03/24/2015 12:15 pm
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   12:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ya...That's how I found out the Scott # area66, but not sure or cant find out when the stamp was issued..

Robert
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3223 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   12:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Wow, sure are fond of the forgeries!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   1:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Wow, sure are fond of the forgeries!


Forgery...?????

Robert
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7081 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   1:44 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The forgers were not targeting us in this case...they were attempting to defraud the system of the tax, probably for "hooch" or refilled bottles. I would love to find an actual forgery of one of these, but not enough to pay the price sought by a dealer who has already identified it as a forgery. I'd like to find my own.

[edited to add: Just so no one is confused, the numbering is Van Dam numbering, not Scott. Scott does not list these.]
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Cjd - 03/24/2015 1:50 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3223 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   2:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Let me see if I have the definitions correct..
Forgery.. produced to defraud the stamp issuing entity
Fake.. Produced to defraud collectors
Is that correct?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7081 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   2:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The terms are bandied about imprecisely. Scott uses forgery for items meant to defraud collectors or governments.

A government would probably say you counterfeited a stamp of theirs.

A fake is usually meant to describe something that has been altered to make it something else; probably something more attractive than it otherwise was. An added inverted overprint to a plain vanilla stamp is probably best described as a fake.

Unless it created something that never existed. Then it is bogus, or a fantasy.

Clear as mud. And someone else will have three different definitions. Just wait.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3223 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   2:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yep, clear as mud!

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7081 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   3:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I would usually use "postal forgery" to describe something intended to defraud the government's postal service, but that term doesn't fit this situation very well.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
692 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   5:56 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jarnick to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Usual usage is "forgery" if the fake stamp was created to defraud the collector; "counterfeit" if its purpose was to defraud the government or postal system.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3223 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   6:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
So the two Bootlegger QU3's listed on the CanadaRevenueStamps.com site linked to above site are mislabeled forgery instead of Counterfiet?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by littleriverphil - 03/24/2015 8:35 pm
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   7:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
mislabeled forgery instead of Conuterfiet?


Ahhhhh...Forgery to me is trying to copy an item to make money, to fool the post office, to fool people...I think forgery is used appropriately here...Just my opinion.

And not a very good forgery as seen by my colour samples taken, forgery colour on the right...And my stamp colour sample on the left..You would think if they spent that much time perfecting the design that they would spend more time doing a colour match.

Robert





Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by wert - 03/24/2015 8:05 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3223 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   8:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Difference of color mixture? Not as stable? 19th century banknote companies had difficulties keeping colors concistent between printings. Would differnt paper make the same ink appear that differnt?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 03/24/2015   10:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Would differnt paper make the same ink appear that differnt?


littleriverphil...I would imagine the more softer the fibers the more it would bleed with the chemical reaction of the paper itself, the harder the paper the less bleeding.
Rober
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous TopicReplies: 37 / Views: 7,080Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05