Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

The Stamps Of Australia : On Steiner Pages.

Previous Page | Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 1,928 / Views: 192,207Next Topic
Page: of 129
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/08/2018   4:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Marcophily.
Stumped.

Victorian Postmark includes "T.O." any members aware of what that indicates please?

3rd Wmk 3d, Die l (Window of use circa 1915-1922)

We think it may be WALPEUP (exists as a rail station)
We also figure CDS ring allows 12-14 characters?

Large bragging rights for a solution.............

Can only be a choice of........ (if WAL)
Wal Wal
Waldron
Walhalla
Walkerville
Wallace
Wallace R.S.
Wallacedale
Wallaloo
Wallaloo East
Wallan Wallan
Wallinduc
Wallington
Wallup
Wallup East
Walmer
Walpa
Walpeup
Walpeup R.S.
Walsh's Creek
Walwa
Walwa Creek
Walwal

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 03/08/2018 4:06 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2941 Posts
Posted 03/08/2018   4:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add PostmasterGS to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
T.O. is likely telegraph office. If the placename is symmetrical, the "W" word is probably 6-7 characters in length.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Presenting the GermanStamps.net Collection - Germany, Colonies, & Occupied Territories, 1872-1945
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/08/2018   5:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you Postmaster. Well done.
I'll take a new approach then, in my searches.

I think we can now discount WALPEUP

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 03/08/2018 5:15 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/08/2018   5:22 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

I'll try and run this past Mr. Dave Elsmore.

http://www.ozrevenues.com/Articles/...legraph.html
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2941 Posts
Posted 03/08/2018   7:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add PostmasterGS to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rod,

How about "T.O. WAL WAL"?

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Presenting the GermanStamps.net Collection - Germany, Colonies, & Occupied Territories, 1872-1945
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/08/2018   7:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Sorry... we cannot have this....Americans solving Australian Postmarks!

Bravo! Postmaster.
My colleague shall be delighted. (He whom snorted, when I suggested the 3rd letter was an "L")

Please accept bragging rights.

"Wal Wal PO 7/3/1887; closed 30/1/1981"

From the internet:
FWIW - there is a Wal Wal listed in Freeman & White as a railway station. Opened 7/3/1887, S. East of Murtoa, 270km S.W. of GPO.

Author "Traralgon 3844" (In 2009)
Many small 'Post Offices' in towns like WAL WAL were run out of a spare room at someones house. You didn't need to handle much mail to be declared a post office in the 30's. They were also the local telegrapgph office.

Some did not handle enough mail to be designated a Post Office. They did handle the local telegrams and were designated Telegraph Office and in many cases handled small amounts of mail. In this case the Date Stamp would have read T.O. WAL WAL.

When the were upgraded to a Post Office they were generally given a new date stamp. In the meantime the old Date Stamp had the T.O. burnished off. That is the most likely case in this instance unless WAL WAL started off as a Receiving Office and then the Date Stamp would have read R.O. WAL WAL.

The Railway Stations usually had the R.S. after the name.

Similarly in later years the suburban Post Office date stamps had the S.E.6 and the like burnished off when the changeover to Post Codes was taking place. You often find post marks with a blank area after the name.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 03/08/2018 8:04 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/08/2018   8:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
symmetrical, the "W" word is probably 6-7 characters in length.


WAL WAL 7 letters........not bad there, Postmaster.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/08/2018   8:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
1885
Victoria.
Cost of telegrams
1d (One Penny) per word, minimum 6 words.



Telegram Form (Guess) Circa 1968.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 03/08/2018 8:27 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/08/2018   11:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

From Mr. Dave Elsmore........

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/09/2018   12:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply


David.... this is where your Kangaroo was cancelled............

The WAL WAL Post Office. (Telegraph Office and Store)

Recently sold (Settler's Cottage 10.25 Acres multiple titles) $175,000



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4478 Posts
Posted 03/10/2018   08:25 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add angore to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I just started sorting through my Australia KV stamps and it is getting complicated.

Is there some simple checklist on how to quickly identify these. I see perforations, watermarks, colors,and Dies types per Scott. Gibbons as expected is even more complex and have not looked for a SG/Scott cross reference. SG also seems more illustrated.

I skimmed through the 52 pages in this thread (lot of information) but nothing seemed to help. I could have missed something.

Also, Steiner does not seem to have spaces for some minor varieties (like 72a).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Al
Edited by angore - 03/10/2018 08:27 am
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8622 Posts
Posted 03/10/2018   09:07 am  Show Profile Check GeoffHa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add GeoffHa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Try here

https://goscf.com/t/7020&SearchTerm...ps,explained

I'm sorry to say that I wrote off early Aussie and NZ -too complex for me!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/10/2018   11:25 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I just started sorting through my Australia KV stamps and it is getting complicated.


Angore,
You probably don't know the half of it.
The best bet is just to collect the basic set, as per Steiner, unless you intend to commit vast amounts of time and study, and money.

I'll post the basic set, (forget catalogue numbers and prices)
At the other end, the specialised Catalogues, break down every stamp issue to 16 disected blocks and identify every scratch, dot and lick in that block.
It is mind boggling.

Aussie Al, our member specialises in KGV, as do John and others.

If you get a query on one just post.



This Catalogue (available online free somewhere, I think)
Has 52 Pages of information, on just the one stamp.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 03/10/2018 11:29 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4478 Posts
Posted 03/10/2018   11:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add angore to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for feedback. After going through some, the first step seems to be watermark since Scott seems to use this a grouping. The one I do not understand yet is Die I vs Die II. The Scott description does not include a comparison. I do not plan collect deeper than Steiner for now but the lot I had purchased had a few with Scott numbers on backside.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Al
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/10/2018   2:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

If you are talking Sc#72a

Then that's a small crown and A Wmk 3d

Die l and Die ll differentiate with the figure of value, Die l are thin.
Once you have a comparison, never forgotten.

I'll post a split image later... need some zzzzzzz

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 129 Previous TopicReplies: 1,928 / Views: 192,207Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05