| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 2,382 |
|
|
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts |
|
|
Hi guys..Take a look at my two Scott 44's...Left one normal border, right one big border..Got any bigger out there (even on any stamp) This stamp on the right is 16.5% bigger than the normal stamp on the left. Robert  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
173 Posts |
|
|
Any theories as to how the super jumbo came about? Don't see much evidence of adjacent stamps in the perfs.
|
Send note to Staff 
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
India
557 Posts |
|
|
Barwani 1939 1A Ranjitsinh Indrajitsinh Shishodiya (1888#8210;1930) chocolate typograph (SG 39B) https://www.ebay.com/itm/-/188882101930 target _blank 188882101930 /a chocolatetypographSG39B.jpg" border="0" style='cursor:default' onClick='doimage(this,event)'> |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote:
Any theories as to how the super jumbo came about? Don't see much evidence of adjacent stamps in the perfs.  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Norway
1661 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
433 Posts |
|
|
Hello Robert, Here 6 X Nr.34 on cover to USA (jumbos attached to narrow stamps) Best regards Sylvain  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3496 Posts |
|
|
To the OP's 8c stamp, I've definitely seen, on some early US stamps, where the top and bottom row stamps, have, on occasion, gotten perforated like this. I would speculate, based upon what I can see of the 8c queen here, that it is likely a bottom row stamp.
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1125 Posts |
|
|
Here are a few jumbo small queens of each denomination. The second 6¢ may not be a jumbo, but it is possibly the best centered copy of a particular variety. (and the 2nd ½¢ has a nice reentry). Enjoy. Chip  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1125 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3496 Posts |
|
|
hornet - that jumbo attached to narrow stamps example is really interesting. It appears that the vertical perforations for that column were incorrectly set. What I have seen in the past is where, essentially, the horizontal perforations for either the top or bottom row were incorrectly set - above the top or below the bottom. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator
United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
Chipg, thanks for posting Scott/Unitrade 43c, the 5c on 6c major re-entry. That is definitely one I would like to find and add to my collection some day. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Partime - 12/01/2016 12:23 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
1361 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
433 Posts |
|
|
Quote:
hornet - that jumbo attached to narrow stamps example is really interesting. It appears that the vertical perforations for that column were incorrectly set. What I have seen in the past is where, essentially, the horizontal perforations for either the top or bottom row were incorrectly set - above the top or below the bottom Hello txstamp, Your are right. Here an example of what you wrote about. Bavarian, Pfennigzeit Wappen (comb perf) 1889-1911 with the top horizontal row not correctly set. Best regards Sylvain  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Egypt
372 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
728 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 2,382 |
|
Posted 11/28/2016 10:09 am
