Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Anyone More Info On This Via Air Mail Cancellation From Tampa? (1931)

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,339Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
Netherlands
641 Posts
Posted 06/27/2017   3:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Dutch US Stamp Collector to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
anyone more info on this via air mail cancellation from Tampa?

BACK HAS A MAIL CLERK p.j.k. ROUNDCANCELLATION

Send note to Staff

Moderator
1589 Posts
Posted 06/27/2017   4:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add blcjr to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I'm no expert, but I don't see a distinctive "air mail" cancellation, just a regular cancellation. The postage ($0.05) is correct for the air mail rate in 1931. Tampa had airmail service on on CAM (Contract Air Mail) Route #10 beginning in 1926. Initially CAM #10 ran from Miami - Fort Myers - Tampa - Jacksonville, but in 1928 this part of the route became part of CAM #19. It is curious that it was posted from Tampa rather than from Fort Myers, since Boca Grande is closer to Fort Myers than Tampa, even considering the problem of getting around Charlotte Sound.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
6326 Posts
Posted 06/27/2017   4:45 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The three strikes of the "Via Air Mail" in magenta are postal markings.
The black handstamp with "Via air mail" with the pictorial airplane is privately applied by the sender.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 06/27/2017 4:45 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts
Posted 06/27/2017   4:55 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
This cancel is not listed in the first edition of the Loso-DeWindt catalog of 20th Century fancy cancels. That listing is not complete and so does not immediately disqualify the cancel.

The rate is correct. That the 2c Washington was missed by the duplex cancel is not particularly worrying.

Still, on first look, the ink of the airplane-in-the-clouds does not match the ink of the duplex-type cancels used on the envelope. The stamps are only lightly touched by the airplane-in-the-clouds, barely tying stamps to the cover, so very tentatively struck. These factors make this very unlike the fancies of the period.

So I don't believe this to be a cancel, even unofficial; the great majority of the fancies of this period were not authorized by PO headquarters but were allowed by local postmasters. The airplane-in-the-clouds could be a fake added later to a plain airmail cover.

We'll see what others have to say.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
Netherlands
641 Posts
Posted 06/29/2017   3:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dutch US Stamp Collector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
thank you all for your input, much appriciated
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,339Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.11 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05