| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 6,481 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
49 Posts |
|
|
I got my Sonic Precision Multi Gauge today and found what looks like a Scott #544, perf 11 x 11, on a 1922 postcard from Maine. Check it out.  Here is the measurement from side to side, from the leftmost pixel to the right. The distance equals 1.89 cm, or ~18.9mm. Rounding error due to fuzzy pixels.  Here is the measurement from top to bottom. The distance is 22.2 cm, or ~22.2cm:  Here are the perf measurements. The top and bottom show clearly as 11-73 on the gauge:  Here is the side perf, between 11-70 and 11-72 on the gauge:  What do you guys think? Do I have the real deal?
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
920 Posts |
|
|
Per the Scott catalog the earliest documented use of #544 was Dec. 17, 1922...almost 7 months after the date on the postcard.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1756 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
578 Posts |
|
|
The Sonic gauge actually has rectangular overlays for quickly verifying flat vs. various rotary press dimensions. Is there a reason you didn't just do that? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
49 Posts |
|
|
Quote: The Sonic gauge actually has rectangular overlays for quickly verifying flat vs. various rotary press dimensions. Is there a reason you didn't just do that? I did and it passed the 22.25 line and looked like it was right on the 22.5 line. That's why I had to measure it electronically. I'm not sure if the gauge is accurate. http://dubinweb.com/USpostagestamps/onecent.htmlThis site here says that a perf. 11 is a 544 when it measures 19mm x 22.5mm and a 498 if it measures 18.5-19 x 22mm. Mine is > 22 mm. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2544 Posts |
|
|
if you are sure what it is, you should send it in for a certificate, then it will be saleable |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1096 Posts |
|
|
Sorry to say, but it's a 498, but don't stop looking - you may stumble across one... The color is also too bright green to be the 544, should be more of a duller gray green. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1270 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
205 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1348 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1270 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
578 Posts |
|
|
BTW, several others have told you it's a 498, but I'm not so sure. Just eyeing it up, the aspect ratio looks "tall" to me, not like a flat plate stamp. And there are some genuine 544's that look like they could be this guy's brother (see PF certs 197728 & 197729, for example).
The date on this would be a new EKU, but I don't believe the Scott 544 production is very well-understood. IMO, it's possible the EKU could move earlier than the current Dec 1922 date.
Anyway, I'm not saying it is or isn't, simply that it doesn't look "flat plate" to me from your scan. If you can post a scan with the stamp aligned with the Sonic overlay, that would answer a lot of questions (and yes, I believe those Sonic gauges are pretty accurate - in fact, the Sonic and the Kiusalas are the only two gauges I've kept after 20+ years of dealing full-time). As a second option, scan that item with a 498 next to it & graphically overlay the designs.
If you're "sure" of the measurements, I might take a chance and send it off for a cert. Let us know how it turns out! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
49 Posts |
|
|
I'm not so sure anymore. The Sonic rotary frame is kind of useless for these Washington/Franklin issues. The stamp hits the black line, and I'm measuring it slightly longer than 22mm, not 22.50mm. Maybe it shrunk? I got a bunch of false readings with the Sonic gauge yesterday showing rotary on flat press stamps. The red Scott #595, #634 and similar are a nightmare, since they all show up as rotary on the gauge. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by appletonco - 10/21/2017 3:31 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
1375 Posts |
|
|
I think the Phil-a-meter gauge is what you need. It's quite accurate while the US multigauge is not. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 6,481 |
|