This is part 3 of the material I acquired at Chicagopex, this one devoted to revenue documents.
I'll start with a document I actually acquired about a month before the show. It's one that Ron (revenuermd) had posted about here back in August. Huron County, Michigan must have had an intermittent issue with revenue stamp supply, as there are a host of illegal usages on marriage certificates from that county in 1898 and 1899.
This particular document has a 10-cent postage stamp (Scott 273) with a violet provisional "IR" overprint. However, it is not the same overprint as used on Scott R156-R158, which were also privately produced. Rather it is a smaller overprint using a different font.
Richard Friedberg just had a similar document that he sent into the PF and got a cert on, and he plans to lobby Amos to include this after R158, or at least a mention via footnote. I contemplated buying it, but Richard's example sold in short order for $1,000, which was more than I wanted to pay.
That is also what the seller of the example I obtained wanted for his, but I was able to work out a trade that brought the final cost down considerably. I will likely send mine in for a cert at some point, referencing the cert from Richard's example.

Now, on to the Chicagopex pickups...
First, a lovely CDV, where the point of interest is not the stamp or cancel, but rather the backstamp: a very ornate large-format stencil. Given how other photographer backstamp stencils have been used, it is quite possible that there are examples where this was also used as a stamp cancel, which I would love to find.

An 1863 insurance premium receipt with a 25-cent Bond imperf (R43a) affixed. The Bond imperfs are fairly scarce on document. Actually, far too many R43a on the market are trimmed part perfs.

Next, an illegal usage of postage as revenue on an 1863 check. Additionally, the tax was underpaid, as it should have been 2 cents. While there was a 1-cent inland exchange rate for promissory notes, there was no such animal for checks.

This is a bank check made out to Marc (Marel? Marcel?) Kuntz, of the Kuntz Brewery, and the stamp is canceled with their beer stamp cancel. Unusual.

Attractive bill of lading with a paddle-wheel steamer vignette, featuring handstamp cancels with the steamship's name and the captain's name.

Attractive billhead from the Ames Plow Co.

A ratty and tattered, yet still attached second and third bills of foreign exchange, with R25c and California revenue affixed. From Mike Mahler's book on Civil War revenue stamped documents (emphasis added):
Quote:
Bills of exchange, the primary instrument for transferring funds over long distances in the mid-19th century, were drafts drawn on a distant source of funds , typically made in sets of two or more, essentially identical except for being designated First, Second, Third (and occasionally Fourth) of Exchange, or similar terms, so made to allow for the possibility that one or more might be lost in transit. Once one was paid, the others became void. In earlier times, the First and Second had been sent to the drawee by different vessels and/or different routes. By the 1860s, though, normally only the First was mailed to the destination, and the other bill(s) of the set held in reserve.
So if the standard practice by the 1860s was that the 2nd and 3rd were held in reserve, why are there stamps affixed to these? Wouldn't the tax on the transaction been applied to the 1st? Or is this a case where the 1st didn't make it?... and if that were the case, wouldn't the 2nd and 3rd then have been separated with the 3rd held in reserve?

Illegal usage of revenue as postage on a picture postcard, with a great strike of an RPO cancel.

R15 bisect as part of a strip of 3, paying 5 cents tax on an 1870 contract (agreement).

Memo for a transfer of silver bullion interest, unusual in that 1 cent tax was paid despite no tax being owed. Perhaps there was a 1-cent minimum in order to process the form?

1872 3rd bill of exchange, New York to London, from Louis Iken (cotton broker), cancelled with a large format device that Iken used to modify his business checks upon the break-up of his partnership (the bar obliterated the previous business name).

This is a very unusual certificate, an underwriter renewal certificate. I've not seen one before, nor had anyone at Chicagopex who I showed it to. As a bonus, it has a great ornate insurance agent handstamp cancel.

Bill of lading from the Boston and Providence Railroad, with an illegal usage of a 2-cent Blackjack as revenue.

Monthly railroad pass, taxed as an agreement (see language above stamp). There are some very beautiful railroad passes with RNs imprinted upon them, but they are incredibly expensive. The ones like this from the Civil War era are actually less common, but they bring less.

An 1866 dog license from Brookline, Mass., with a dog's head vignette. Very uncommon document type. Reading the text of the statutes, it's clear that while while there were penalties for harming a licensed dog, society of the time had no love for unlicensed animals, which were to be killed on sight. The SPCA would not approve...
Quote:
EXTRACTS FROM THE GENERAL STATUTES.
CHAPTER 88.
SECTION 52. Every owner or keeper of a dog shall annually, on or before the Thilrtieth day of April, cause it to be registered, numbered, described and licensed, for one year from the first day of the ensuing May, in the office of the clerk of the city or town wherein he resides; and shall cause it to wear around its neck a collar distinctly marked with its owner's name and registered number, and shall pay for such license two dollar for a male dog, and five dollars for a female dog.
SECT. 53. The clerk shall issue the license and receive and pay the money therefor into the county treasury, retaining to own use ten cents for each license. The treasurer shall keep an accurate and separate account of all sums received and paid out, under the provisions of this chapter, relating to dogs, which account shall at all times be open to the [insp]ection of any voter of the place.
SECT. 54. The clerk shall annually within one week after the first day of May, post in some conspicuous public place, a list of all dogs licensed for the current year; and shall furnish a copy thereof to the chief of police of the city, or one of the constables of his town; and shall also, from time to time, furnish said officer with a list of such dogs as are subsequently licensed during the year.
SECT. 55. Any owner of a dog may, at any time, have it licensed until the first day of the ensuing May, upon paying the sum as provided in section fifty-two; but such license shall not exempt him from the penalty of the following section, on complaint made prior to the issuing of the license. No new license for the current year shall be necessary upon the removal of a licensed dog into another city or town, unless required by some by-law passed under section sixty-seven.
SECT. 56. Whoever keeps a dog contrary to the provisions of this chapter, shall forfeit ten dollars, to be recovered by complaint to use of the place wherein the dog is kept.
SECT. 57. Whoever wrongfully removes the collar from or steals a dog, licensed and collared, as aforesaid, shall be punished by fine not exceeding fifty dollars; and whoever wrongfully kills, maims, entices or carries away such a dog, shall be liable to its owner for its value in an action of tort. Whoever distributes or exposes any poisonous substance, with the intent that the same shall be eaten by any dog, shall be punished by fine not exceeding fifty nor less than ten dollars.
SECT. 58. Any person may, and every police officer and constable shall, kill or cause to be destroyed, all dogs going at large and not licensed and collared according to the provisions of this chapter. And such officers, when not otherwise paid for their services, shall receive from the city or town treasury fifty cents for each dog so destroyed by them.
SECT. 66. The mayor and aldermen of each city and the selectmen of each town, shall require all dogs not licensed and collared according to the foregoing provisions, to be destroyed, and shall enforce all the penalties herein provided. Any officer refusing or neglecting to perform the duties herein imposed upon him, shall shall be punished by fine not exceeding twenty-five dollars, to be paid into the city or town treasury.

A colorfully printed envelope of perfume powder with RB21 affixed, with "S.P.H. 1899" (Standard Perfume House) straight line cancel.

Scott # RO157a, proprietary match stamp from D. M. Richardson, used illegally/improperly as a documentary on an 1867 handwritten receipt.

This next one is a great piece. Not only is it a first day of tax usage, which are highly sought after, but it is also an illegal/improper usage, with RB28 2-cent proprietary battleship used instead of a documentary. A double whammy!

Gorgeous Phillips & Jordan Iron Company stock certificate, featuring an R112 with socked-on-the nose cancel at right along with a hammered matching embossed seal at left. What really takes this certificate to 11 is the manufacturing vignette at center. It may not be apparent in the scan, but it is printed in reflective metallic bronze, extremely unusual.


This may very well be the largest ornate handstamp cancel I have ever seen, on a billhead from Jacob Ritter, "importer of bolting cloths". The branding in the cancel text matches the branding at upper left on the billhead. Gorgeous!

Lastly, a very scarce bisect, Scott # RB4d on a complete label for a trial size of "Fish's Saratoga Asperient". The regular size would have been taxed at 4 cents, hence the 2-cent tax. Scott lists but does not price RB4d. This is the first example I have ever seen.
Bart's (revcollector) brother Michael, who saw it at a previous show was excited to see it, as it matches almost exactly, one that he purchased approximately 40 years ago. The two examples help corroborate one another. Michael is submitting his example to the PF for a cert along with images of this example, and I likely will do the same with mine.
An image of Michael's example follows mine.

