| Author |
Replies: 79 / Views: 12,031 |
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

Canada
3963 Posts |
|
|
Very Nice pages Rod   Dianne  |
Send note to Staff
|
Don't grumble that the roses have thorns, be thankful that the thorns have roses |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Very Nice pages Rod Thanks go to you Dianne, Your swaps of Mint Unhinged 1991 were fabulous, Thank you. ------------------ If any members can read the Opt, shall welcome advice.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
1898 WATERMARKING Any members have any tricks for these? Dashed if I can see any, esp with strong Pmks. Ronsonol is useless, as one can see through the stamp. SIGNASCOPE was of no use.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
201 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Ronsonol is useless, as one can see through the stamp I've been struggling with the same issue when trying to sort out my Brazilian definitives. I've had to clean hinges etc off a lot of them and the watermarks seem to be totally legible on every stamp when I soak them but the watermarks of some mysteriously vanish when they're dry As I have quite a few copies and most are worth very little, if I can't detect the watermark from the dry stamp I simply put the offending stamp in the "No ID" packet. Fortunately a lot of the watermarks are decipherable one way or another using a raking light or simply laying them on a dark surface. For the occasional valuable issue I am considering whether it's worth re-soaking, the number of possibles is manageable |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote: I've been struggling with the same issue when trying to sort out my Brazilian definitives. Been there. when I soak, I use the sandwich method, when they come out the water, I place like watermarks, in each sandwich, with a scrap of paper indicating what wmk. They are indeed difficult. Not yet tried the early China in water. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Quote:If any members can read the Opt, shall welcome advice.  Rod, Customs revenue for Jiangsu. Right column 2 characters top to bottom: customs Top row 2 characters, right to left: Jiangsu Left column 2 characters top to bottom: designated use (i.e., "for use only"...) EDIT: corrected/clarified last 2 lines |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by khj - 02/16/2022 3:55 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Thanks, Rod!
My mind was partially elsewhere when I typed the reply and I typed 1 line incorrectly while the last line could have better word choice for clarity. I have already corrected it in the above post:
Top row 2 characters, right to left: Jiangsu Left column 2 characters top to bottom: designated use (i.e., "for use only"...) |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by khj - 02/16/2022 3:54 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Northeastern Provinces I like to work with Scott "Types" It looks like these stamps also have a type as "OS2" (North China) along with "A1" ? I wonder if identical vignette? Look similar to Gibbons Type NC5 etc, unissued stamps prepared for the Japanese occupation of Mengjiang.  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 02/25/2022 11:52 pm |
|
Replies: 79 / Views: 12,031 |
|