Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

#613 Is There Any Real Believers

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 124 / Views: 17,117Next Topic
Page: of 9
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts
Posted 05/05/2019   5:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
the rotaries, it is a real problem if you give us distorted images from a camera phone like the first one. Focus is also important. Showing us portions of the design to compare does not work here, either. A flat bed scanner works best.

If you have looked at Scott, then the difference between flat plate and rotary stamps of this design is the height of the design. Using your last image:

The same height almost exactly. There are differences in paper shrinkage, etc. and there is a small difference in width due to that here. But the rotary stamp must be taller than the flat plate stamp for this issue.

See also:
https://www.linns.com/news/us-stamp...arding-.html
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 05/05/2019   5:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You guys are making me want to pull out my hundreds and hundreds of old American stamps stored in boxes in the basement.

Robert

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
276 Posts
Posted 05/06/2019   01:15 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dry Tech to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
All of this begs the question: When was the last time someone actually found an unaccounted for 613?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
674 Posts
Posted 05/06/2019   02:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add mdroth to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hate replying to this thread - I don't want to cause undo encouragement?!

If memory serves, that strip of 3 was discovered somewhat recently - within the last decade or so??

Found it - Siegel auction #1139:


Quote:
For the first approximately 70 years that this issue was known, the largest multiples recorded were two pairs, one of which has been broken into two singles. The discovery of this strip by a Harding specialist created a sensation in the philatelic press before it was first auctioned by Matthew Bennett in 2007. In the process of expertizing the strip, the discoverer went to the National Postal Museum to study the eight proof sheets (3,200 stamps) pulled from the plates that were used for the rotary press printings. On the fifth sheet, the matching plating marks were discovered, proving that this multiple came from Positions 56-58 in the upper right pane of Plate 14867 -- a plate that was used only for rotary press printings.

Our updated census of the 2c Harding Rotary Perf 11, available at our website at http://www.siegelauctions.com/dynam.../613/613.pdf , records 45 used singles (one faintly cancelled, if at all), one used pair and this unique used strip of three.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 9 Previous TopicReplies: 124 / Views: 17,117Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05