Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Acsc 222 2˝d On Acsc 188 2-D Scarlet Surcharge 1941

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 678Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
877 Posts
Posted 12/28/2018   11:10 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add itma to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I have a copy of this this stamp with a prominent flaw in the lower left border. This is not listed in ACSC either under 188 or 222. Does anyone know if this is a constant flaw or an EFO?


Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 12/28/2018   11:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think this issue has probably not been researched very thoroughly, so I have a feeling that no one would know either way. I'd be most surprised if someone has seen it before.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
877 Posts
Posted 12/28/2018   7:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add itma to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks, Jim. I hadn't though of that possibility.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/28/2018   8:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

I checked my Sc#169 John Ash sheet.....nothing there.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1692 Posts
Posted 12/28/2018   9:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rob041256 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi itma

I haven't seen one like it, it's definitely an unlisted variety, though it may be one of many one-off varieties that dominated early pre-decimal stamps.

Rob
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 678Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05