Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

The Philatelic Foundation - Determined Value On Certs

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 40 / Views: 3,328Next Topic
Page: of 3
Valued Member
81 Posts
Posted 01/14/2019   10:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Redtail to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
mdroth, the price, in this case, is a function of DV therefore if the DV is over $490 the price goes up so understanding how DV works (not cut and dry at all) and policies around it for PF are relevant in my view because this is not a service that can be "shopped around." To be clear PF is the BEST and i'm VERY HAPPY WITH IT. Sorry if this post looked like a rag on PF, that was not what I was saying. As a consumer, I'm trying to manage costs by understand pitfalls of DV as it relates to PF services.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Redtail - 01/14/2019 10:58 pm
Valued Member
United States
283 Posts
Posted 01/16/2019   12:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add craigk to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
While the PF lists 5.5% of 'submitted value' within the Cert Fees box, the application actually demands the submitted value to be "catalog or market, whichever is higher".
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
283 Posts
Posted 01/16/2019   01:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add craigk to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The PSE submission form requests catalog value only, with following note in their terms of service:

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1818 Posts
Posted 01/16/2019   10:56 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rlsny to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Revenuecollector, on the form you submit to the PF, the column you fill out is labelled "Value, Higher of Cat. or Market"

So it is correct that the minimum submitted value is cat value.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Singapore
750 Posts
Posted 01/16/2019   11:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add pennyblackie to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I was wondering if their fees is based on a percentage of DV rather than a fixed fee, wouldn't these bodies be more inclined to quote a higher DV? I am not saying they will do that, but since their earnings is tied to the value they indicate, there is always a presumption of bias.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
12555 Posts
Posted 01/17/2019   12:20 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
What bias? They are a nonprofit for goodness sake. I sincerely doubt that the PF is sitting around trying to figure clever ways of abusing stamp collectors wallets. There is no smoke here let alone fire. I am really starting to wonder what all of the noise here in regards to the PF fees is all about. It makes no sense. It is simple as can be.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6432 Posts
Posted 01/17/2019   07:17 am  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I've always filled out the form with current Scott catalogue values; this discussion is the first I've seen where someone regularly submits using lower ebay prices...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
81 Posts
Posted 03/30/2019   5:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Redtail to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Philatelic Foundation has announced a new service for stamps with low market value despite their high catalogue value which really reflect the value of very fine, fault-free examples. Therefore, submitters can expect the same quality and expertise for their stamps without having to pay a high fee for their certificate. The fees, which are still based upon catalogue value are:

A. Catalog value of $5,000.00 to $10,000.00 with an actual fair market value estimate of 25% or less of catalog value due to condition issues, including faults and/or poor centering.

Flat fee of $75.00

B. Catalog Value in excess of $10,000.00 with an actual fair market value of 25% or less of catalog value to due to condition issues, incluLowMarketValueding faults and/or poor centering.

Flat fee of 5.5% based on fair market value with minimum fee of $100.00

For each, the submitter is to state the fair market value, subject to revision by PF, if the fair market value is grossly undervalued. Applications are exactly the same and can be found here.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6432 Posts
Posted 03/30/2019   5:19 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
That program has been around for 3-4 years now. I just wish the valuation floor for the program was lower than $5,000.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
538 Posts
Posted 03/30/2019   6:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rhett to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, both PSE and the PF have had this type service for about 3-4 years now. I have used the PSE PC/F (Poorly Centered/Faulty) service twice but have not yet used the PF service of this type.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous TopicReplies: 40 / Views: 3,328Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05