Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

I Was Wondering About This Franklin 112 Stamp

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 49 / Views: 3,978Next Topic
Page: of 4
Bedrock Of The Community
12615 Posts
Posted 02/17/2019   3:49 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Paper and steel are poor comparisons as are sections in tension and compression without external static or dynamic loading.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
282 Posts
Posted 02/17/2019   9:16 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dan Townsend to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Occams Razer say:If you have two theories that explain the observed facts,then you should use the simplest,until more evidence comes along.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
12615 Posts
Posted 02/17/2019   9:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Simple is indeed good. With that in mind we have here a damaged (creased) 112 with some type of residue in small amounts on its rear. Case closed.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
282 Posts
Posted 02/17/2019   11:18 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dan Townsend to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You are right it is damaged and it is a 112 but with residue all over this stamp thin but never less there.
What Im getting at is what class does this belong in, not the 112b because it is flawed and didn't have grills a human mistake, well this must have been a machine mistake
the human mistake most likely made many more copy's or sheets of stamps and we are sure their is a least 9 examples of these human mistakes and for this machine mistake I guarantee they cant be that many machine mistakes around, what is more valuable? Or is their even a value here because its a flaw.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 4 Previous TopicReplies: 49 / Views: 3,978Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.11 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05