| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 2,321 |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts |
|
|
I haven't seen a NSW postage due with such a pale shade before (even paler than the scan makes it look in fact). Could this be a dry ink variety? Thoughts anyone? 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by jimjamtwo - 06/26/2019 09:31 am |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6433 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1692 Posts |
|
|
I doubt if it's a variety, more likely chemically altered or a changeling. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member

United States
466 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
898 Posts |
|
|
Jimjamtwo... I'll back Rob041256. Suspect someone's experimented/fiddled with solvents or bleach in distilled water etc. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by finches - 06/28/2019 03:33 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
927 Posts |
|
|
These stamps were issued green (no scarlet or rosine).
They have fugitive ink, so if your stamp has no gum it has probably been soaked and lost much of the green to the water. |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
898 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1692 Posts |
|
|
I did some research on fugitive ink and they were used as a deterrent to anyone attempting to alter the stamp, when immersed in water the ink fades preventing any removal of fiscal pen cancellations.
But I cannot see any cancellations of any type to support the stamp having fugitive ink deployed, as it looks unused, fugitive ink being deployed would have kept visible remnants of a cancellation remaining on the stamp.
I believe it was a changeling, as the ink faded due to exposure to a strong light or to some natural or not so natural chemical reaction.
As it seems to be unused and there is no gum, the missing gum is mostly due to rust or toning on the gum being removed to save the stamp, I have seen many unused stamps, especially from the Victorian era missing its gum, it's a common sight as a result of this.
Of course on the other hand if the stamp was immersed in water to remove the gum (there is a better way to remove the gum without immersing it in water), it would activate the fugitive ink.
Rob
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 2,321 |
|