| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 6,136 |
|
|
New Member
Australia
3 Posts |
|
|
Hi, I have a One Pound Jimmy stamp with 2 sideways watermark. Is it a rare stamp? *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
The stamp you posted doesn't seem to match your question. A front scan and a god back scan would be needed for further comments. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
New Member
Australia
3 Posts |
|
|
Oh. Is it an Aboriginal face? Sorry. Not good with technology I'm afraid. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
I'll do some research, Suggestion: "One pound Jimmy" is derogatory. Times have changed, Perhaps your thread title changed to "Aboriginal" I think this is the preferred term. Let's hope we can begin to change our conversation, at least on SCF.
The gentleman pictured is Mr. Gwoya Jungarai.
Back soon.......... Sideways Wmk is normal, Inverted Wmk is scarce ( 9 copies known ?)
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 01/18/2020 5:34 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
The design for the 8'/2d and 2/6 values was prepared by Frank D. Manley and was based on a photograph by Roy Dunstan. The aborigine featured was a Central Australian native known as "One Pound Jimmy" and was so named because when asked how much he charged to perform a task, he invariabfy answered "One pound, Boss." His tribal name was Gwoya Jungarai, and he died on March 28, 1965, while on walkabout with his relatives on Narweitooma cattle station, 120 miles west of Alice Springs. His exact age was not known, but he was over 70 when he died. The 2/6 is in larger format than the 8'/2d. Supplies of the 2/6 Bird (1964) ran out just before Christmas 1965 and as the photogravure press was in constant use preparing the new decimal currency definitives, an emergency printing of two months' supply (800,000) of the 2/6 Aborigine was prepared (No. 272a|. The faulty and much retouched electros for the unwatermarked issues had been destroyed and two earlier electros, last used in 1952, but still in stock had to be used. These showed the Authority imprint as used for the watermarked version and as this was overlooked the imprint now appears on unwatermarked paper. The sepia colour used is distinctly different from the colour of the previous unwatermarked issues (No. 272). These issues first appeared about mid-October, 1965, and came into general use in December. Furthermore, the 1965 printing was on white paper, whereas the earlier unwatermarked issue was on toned paper.
[edit] Stereotypes of indigenous Australians Walkabout's early to mid-century stance on depiction of Indigenous Australians was generally conservative, romantic and stereotyped, a reflection of the then prevailing national attitudes. An instance was Roy Dunstan's full-length portrait entitled "Jimmy" of 1935, standing heroically with a spear and gazing to the distance. 'Jimmy' was Gwoya Jungarai, a Walbiri man, but when his image, cropped to head and shoulders, appeared on the 1950 Australian stamp it was captioned 'Aborigine'. Though belatedly named in an editorial essay, the deprecating moniker 'One Pound Jimmy' stuck.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
New Member
Australia
3 Posts |
|
|
Sorry, my apologies. I looked it up and just went by the name that was mentioned online. No offence intended. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote: No offence intended. None taken Brodes. We are all learning. Welcome to Philately.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1951 Posts |
|
|
"Anything for a pound"? Reminds me of Larry and the Darryl's "Anything for a buck".
Jack Kelley |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1692 Posts |
|
|
Hi Brodes
The stamp depicted a portrait of Gwoya Djungurrayi, also known as 'One Pound Jimmy.' I still call the stamp the 'One Pound Jimmy', as do the majority of collectors, so you aren't out of place by referring to the stamp as the 'One Pound Jimmy'.
The sideways watermark is extremely rare and is catalogued at MUH $5,750; MLH $4,500 and Used $1,500.
It's best to have it certified.
Rob |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1209 Posts |
|
|
I think they are all sideways watermark (except the emergency printing no watermark) & depends on the direction of the watermark that makes them rare .
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
The sideways watermark is normal for this stamp, showing the 'crown over CofA' with the crown to the right of CofA as seen from the back of the stamp. The normal one looks like this from the back of the stamp:    The rare stamp is sideways inverted, with the crown showing to the left of CofA as seen from the back of the stamp. This 'mock-up' (constructed from one of the stamps above) gives a rough idea of what would be seen from the back of the rare sideways inverted watermark stamp:   |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 02/21/2020 02:01 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1692 Posts |
|
|
I incorrectly said just sideways, fairdinkumstamps is correct, the very rare version has an inverted sideways watermark.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
640 Posts |
|
|
I recently acquired the block shown below in a trade with one of our SCF members (Thanks Terri). This block is unwatermarked, the paper is white, and I cannot make out the New South Wales town in the cancel. I also noticed this issue has thick perfs in the upper and lower left corners. Thick, as in, wider than the other perfs. This is another Australian issue that makes a lovely used block. Linus  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2830 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
640 Posts |
|
|
No Shermae. According to Rob, the sideways/inverted watermark is extremely rare and is catalogued at MUH $5,750; MLH $4,500 and Used $1,500. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 6,136 |
|