Hi Ken,
'Who is at fault' does not matter when it comes to data, data is sacred and is supposed to be immune from being manipulated. Allowing data to be changed after the fact negates the entire system. And the fact that this happens behind the scenes, without any transparency at all, clearly shows that it is underhanded and wrong. Note that it is not just the 'good' sellers that
ebay helps by removing negative feedbacks, they remove them for the cartel and NY stamps too.
As moderator, I have access to being able to manipulate the 'post count' in this forum. Rule state that folks have to have 50+ posts before they can buy/sell/trade or use the forum messaging system. How good are the rules if I run around behind the scenes and manipulate the post counts? No transparency, is it Don playing favorites or being vindictive? Or was it 'legitimate'? No one would know. If I did this it would invalidates the forum rules, undermine confidence in the community, and open the door for some very bad things to happen.
Or say you own a company which builds widgets. Obviously you would want to have a handle on how your company is running and the quality of the widgets you sell. So you ask for data from the manufacturing floor, answers to questions like 'how many widgets are coming off the assembly line with defects'? After gathering data for a few months you get the report, "Zero defects, 100% of the widgets worked when they came off the assembly line". But wait, it turns out that your manufacturing manager was catching the widgets that had failed before final test, fixing them on the assembly line, and never documenting the actual fallout. But as owner you are clueless to the real issues on your manufacturing floor. I have fired people for manipulating data. Many sellers also think that they should not be held accountable for a shipping problem. But this is simply wrong. Customers care that your widgets are on their dock on a certain day. They do not care that FedEx has an issue, they contracted with your company to deliver the widgets on a certain day.
The fact that the moronic
ebay feedback system limits a 'tweet-like' 80 characters tells us all we need to know about the actual intent of the system. The system (and many sellers) do not care about any actual feedback that could go towards improving their products or service, they only care about the meaningless rating. Time after time I send sellers GOOD feedback in the form of a message. I invest time in telling them how well the listing described the material, how well it was packed, how quickly the order was filled and shipped. You know, real meaningful feedback that can be used in consideration of the material and service they offer.
But sadly the majority of time I get replies like 'thanks for the message but please leave me an
ebay feedback'. This tells me all I need to know, the feedback system is worthless, these sellers do not care about the product and service they are providing. These sellers only care about playing the feedback game and making it falsely appear that they have 100% satisfaction.
ebay has everyone brainwashed that the feedback system provides a level of confidence and all of this is contributes to the reason there is so much deception and fraud on
ebay. Same for the pleadings 'please do not leave a negative feedback but instead communicate with us before leaving feedback'. It is incredibly lame to do this end run around the feedback system. To be honest, after I have invested my time in giving good feedback to a seller but am still asked to feedback' I rarely will buy from that seller again.
Lastly, how much good is a feedback system when
ebay supports people having 40-50 accounts? If I do not like you, it is simple to use 8-10 accounts to buy some cheap stuff from you with the sole purpose of trashing your feedback. You and
ebay have no idea who the accounts actual belong to. There are countless good sellers who have had this happen to them.
And how much good is a feedback system when there is a strong 3rd party industry of companies buying and selling existing
ebay accounts with preexisting '100% ratings'? there are literally books and website which encourage convicted criminals to start their own
ebay businesses by buying existing
ebay accounts with 100% rating and even 'Top Rated' accounts. So there are bad sellers with 100% feedback.
The reality is that there are really good sellers with less than 100% feedback and really bad sellers with 100% feedback. I do not see how anyone could defend this kind of system. Folks would have to be blind to not see the truck-sized holes in this system and why it cannot be trusted at all.
Don
Edit: Anyone want aged
ebay 'Top Rated/Power Seller 100% rating' accounts?
https://tradingonlineaccounts.com/e...ts-for-sale/Simply search online and find dozens of companies selling
ebay 100% feedback accounts. (Ditto for
Amazon accounts too.)