Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

India 4 Anna Bisect On Part Cover.

Previous Page | Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 48 / Views: 3,979Next Topic
Page: of 4
Valued Member
New Zealand
11 Posts
Posted 12/21/2021   11:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sterling to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
What does this look like under UV light, both long-wave and short-wave?

Unfortunately that's one piece of kit I do not have. What would I be looking for under UV. Please explain.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   01:27 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Sterling,
I have consulted HENDY

Solved my FLEURON query (used from 1840)


Now, RECEIVING HOUSES
Found the indented square OK, but raises questions beyond me
from what I read, it should have subsidiary hammer impressions

London was then 1 postal area.

I leave it in your capable hands
If you can nut it out, please advise.
Perhaps other auxiliary markings were on the missing piece of the cover.
Perhaps regulations changed 9 years hence.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 12/22/2021 01:33 am
Pillar Of The Community
India
557 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   02:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joy Daschaudhuri to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
rod222

Quote:

Found the indented square OK, but raises questions beyond me
from what I read, it should have subsidiary hammer impressions


How all these are applicable on the incoming mail from foreign destination?

The fleuron here is part of the Giles G3 mark of Mumbai.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
India
557 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   02:58 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joy Daschaudhuri to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I shared this in our India Study Circle online group and here are some observations.

• There are 2 black spots (deeper black shade) which are the remnants of original cancels.

• The stamp at the right is affixed later as indicated by torn perfs.

• The stamp at the right is slightly off-aligned with respect to the stamp at the left.

Sterling can confirm the torn perfs and the presence of any gum remnant on the right side.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   03:06 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Joy.

Quote:
How all these are applicable on the incoming mail from foreign destination?


I have yet to read any literature on the process of overseas received mail, at that time, so I am happy to learn.


Quote:
The fleuron here is part of the Giles G3 mark of Mumbai.

Yep, understood that.
When I was considering it may be a Brit Pmk, I was then curious as to when any fleuron was used in a Brit context.
The image solved that for me.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
India
557 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   03:19 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joy Daschaudhuri to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
India
557 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   03:27 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joy Daschaudhuri to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
rod222

Quote:

Was curious SS Pottinger, was not "RMS"


The designation RMS was used by the British Admiralty ships that carried mail and the contract steamers of the companies which were granted Royal Charter of Incorporation.

POSNC mail steamers were all SSs.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
New Zealand
11 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   03:56 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sterling to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Joy

Quote:
• There are 2 black spots (deeper black shade) which are the remnants of original cancels.

• The stamp at the right is affixed later as indicated by torn perfs.

• The stamp at the right is slightly off-aligned with respect to the stamp at the left.

Sterling can confirm the torn perfs and the presence of any gum remnant on the right side.




  • There are 2 black spots as can be seen on the right are they remnants of an earlier cancel its difficult to tell or are they of the original cancel with lines up with the cancel on the stamp on the left. Its debatable.
  • I can confirm that the stamp are a pair there is no evidence that the stamp on the right was added later or the perfs were torn, there is a possibility that there is a fold on the last two perfs as indicated by you in green. At 600 dpi scanning and looking through a loupe of 30 x magnification I do not see it.
  • AS the stamps are a pair they can only be inline.
I can confirm that there are no torn perfs the staining on the right looks more like an oily cancellation than any gum remnants.
I could do a larger scan but limited to what this forum can accept.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   04:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Subsidiary question.
The India Mails
How did the mail, get from Paris to London?
I cannot find any info on this short , last hop.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
India
557 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   04:30 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joy Daschaudhuri to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
rod222

Quote:

Subsidiary question.
The India Mails
How did the mail, get from Paris to London?
I cannot find any info on this short , last hop.


India Mail was carried by rail from Paris to Calais/Boulogne, then by steamer to Dover and then again by rail to London in the 1850s.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
India
557 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   04:32 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joy Daschaudhuri to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Sterling, can you share higher resolution scan of the stamps thru e-mail? I can then send my e-mail address to you.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
New Zealand
11 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   04:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sterling to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes - I could do that. Send me your email address.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Sterling - 12/22/2021 05:22 am
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   06:23 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Iron Paddle Steamer SS POTTINGER

English: Iron paddle steamer Pottinger, 1846 P. & O. Ltd. Built by W. Fairbairn & Son's, Millwall, London. Yard No. 233. Launched: 28th March 1846. 1858. Troops of the 92nd Regiment mutinied, refusing to sail on her from Suez because they would have to berth on deck.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 12/22/2021 06:27 am
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   06:50 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
POSNC mail steamers were all SSs.


This would suggest otherwise,
the POTTINGER was not showing advancement over the wooden hulled steamers.

This suggests P&O were RMSP Royal Mail Steam Packets
so why not the RMS prefix ?


Oops less subservient.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 12/22/2021 06:55 am
Valued Member
United States
75 Posts
Posted 12/22/2021   11:36 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add mljespe to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thoughts:

Firstly, if one of the issues is the tieing of the bisect to envelope, then cannot "similar staining/smudging" that I see around and on both stamps and envelope officially "tie" the stamp to the envelope. That "could be" (not preferred) another way to tie the stamp other than the "official postmark."

Secondly, there are good comments about "higher magnification" ... concur. Which would then also help with the above "firstly".

Lastly, when expertised they can "lift" part of stamp to peer underneath. UV may or may not help but worth a try (as suggested earlier). I have ordered a short/long wave UV thingy and hope it will be of value to me for some items I have.




Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 4 Previous TopicReplies: 48 / Views: 3,979Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05