Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1923-1926 Washington #595 How To ID?

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 23 / Views: 15,258Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
59 Posts
Posted 03/30/2018   7:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Klawbohr to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I noticed that the measurements for 595 are different for Scott and Micarelli 22.75mm and 22mm .

DOES ANYONE KNOW WHY.?

Thanks
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1375 Posts
Posted 03/31/2018   04:53 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stamperix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
yes there are many differences between Scott specialized and the Micarelli book, also many typos in the Micarelli, seems that they care more about the Scott specialized.

but about your question: in this case there is no difference... in both books of mine they say 19.75x22.25mm.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
87 Posts
Posted 04/02/2018   05:35 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add KYfilately to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
best guess on identification here?



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1414 Posts
Posted 04/02/2018   09:38 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cfrphoto to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I noticed that the measurements for 595 are different for Scott and Micarelli 22.75mm and 22mm . DOES ANYONE KNOW WHY.?


There is no "why". Measurements in the Scott Catalog are to the nearest 1/2 millimeter, not nearly accurate enough to be used for stamp identification. Width and height comparison with a known stamp is the most reliable way to determine size and printing method.

Scott 595 resulted from perforating imperforate coil roll fragments vertically and horizontally in a flat plate perforator resulting in a perf 11-72 stamp. Scott 579 started with perforated, uncut coil fragments producing a perf 11-72 x 10-80 stamp.

Coil stamps were intended to be distributed in continuous rolls. Rotary press sheet stamps were perforated in both directions and cut into sheets with selvage on all sides. Top and bottom selvage on coil rolls was cut off. Coil waste sheets did not have side selvage. Experiments with the "electric eye" perforator in the 1930 produced sheet stamps with bars in the selvage needed to guide the perforator.

Horizontal gum breakers ridges will normally be found on rotary press sheet stamps with original gum. Also, later printings of 634 are a brighter carmine with less ink wash on unprinted areas of the design.

This information is on the Internet or the Scott catalog and other reference books.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
87 Posts
Posted 04/02/2018   11:52 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add KYfilately to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

while this is all very informative I have little stamp knowledge and I would greatly appreciate if someone can just tell me from looking at the washington 2 cent block of 6 images I posted exactly which variety they are? should I start a new thread or is it ok to ask this here? thank you all scf members your help has been a blessing!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1414 Posts
Posted 04/02/2018   3:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cfrphoto to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
634 experimental Electric Eye plate variety from 1935-1938.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
87 Posts
Posted 04/02/2018   3:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add KYfilately to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
634a...type II? odds are no its type I i keep telling my boyfriend but he swears he can tell the difference. without going through some process on stampsmarter or whatever can you tell---cfrphoto or anyone---if this block is type I or type II?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
87 Posts
Posted 04/02/2018   3:42 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add KYfilately to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
ok I looked up electric eye got it. thank you!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 23 / Views: 15,258Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.13 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05