Quote:
I noticed that the measurements for 595 are different for Scott and Micarelli 22.75mm and 22mm . DOES ANYONE KNOW WHY.?
There is no "why". Measurements in the Scott Catalog are to the nearest 1/2 millimeter, not nearly accurate enough to be used for stamp identification. Width and height comparison with a known stamp is the most reliable way to determine size and printing method.
Scott 595 resulted from perforating imperforate coil roll fragments vertically and horizontally in a flat plate perforator resulting in a perf 11-72 stamp. Scott 579 started with perforated, uncut coil fragments producing a perf 11-72 x 10-80 stamp.
Coil stamps were intended to be distributed in continuous rolls. Rotary press sheet stamps were perforated in both directions and cut into sheets with selvage on all sides. Top and bottom selvage on coil rolls was cut off. Coil waste sheets did not have side selvage. Experiments with the "electric eye" perforator in the 1930 produced sheet stamps with bars in the selvage needed to guide the perforator.
Horizontal gum breakers ridges will normally be found on rotary press sheet stamps with original gum. Also, later printings of 634 are a brighter carmine with less ink wash on unprinted areas of the design.
This information is on the Internet or the Scott catalog and other reference books.