Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Early Antigua ID - Warning - Bad Example

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,661Next Topic  
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 10/21/2012   01:11 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Partime to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I warned you it was an ugly stamp, but it is the oldest Antigua in my collection, and I am interested in a positive ID. Can't see any watermark, and the rough perforation is approximately 15 1/2 on the right side. Does the cancellation help to narrow down the year? I'm thinking Scott #1, 1862, mostly due to the rough perforations in the 14-16 range, but could be Scott #4 if I could locate the Star watermark. Thanks in advance.

Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 10/21/2012   01:52 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Bad Example ?

Looks fine to me, a lovely stamp.
Pass it my way if it gets too much.

Std A02 Antigua pmk

Looks to me like SG10 yellow green
of course the wmk is your issue.

What dpi did you scan it at? I can run EZPerf over it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 10/21/2012   02:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Rod. Scanned at 1200 dpi then used Free Image Optimizer. I couldn't find a Yellow Green in my Scott's until you mentioned, then located Scott 4a from 1863-67 with Star watermark. All of the other colors appear to be Blue Green. I'll try again to locate the watermark tomorrow, but the color may already determine the stamp.

Thanks for the offer of giving it a new home, but I think I'll keep it for now.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 10/21/2012   02:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks,
been optimised, so I cannot assist.
be aware "SG#8 shades, verge on yellow green" as well.

A good philatelist may know what other world stamps
would carry the same watermark, and whether it exists
"not evident" in border positioned stamps.

We should be respectful to our stamps, if it was the last one in the world, it wouldn't be a "bad example"


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 10/21/2012   04:07 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Gibbons has a note: "Caution is need in buying No.10 as some of the shades of No.8 verge on yellow-green." SG 8 is described as 'green (shades)'.

As the current Gibbons rates SG 10 (yellow-green) at £95 used, and SG 8 at £26, Murphy's Law would suggest that this stamp is an SG 8 with a barely visible watermark.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 10/21/2012   10:34 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rod, Tony. Thanks for your help. It is always fun to post questions late at night here in the States, and then get the Australian crew working on the issue, and then waking up to see some answers.

Under a very bright light and using watermark fluid, it is still not possible to find any indication of the 6 pointed Star, nor the CC Crown watermark. In addition, when compared to my color gauge, I have to admit that the scanner did not do justice, and it is, indeed, a Blue-Green shade, trending toward a dark green. Therefore, I'm going to file it away as an 1862 variety, known as Scott #1 in my books.

As with all of my stamps, they are treated with great respect (unless the grand daughter gets into the collection behind my back). If and when a better copy comes along, I may move this to a lower position. Until such time, this one will stay in its proper place as my first stamp in my Antigua collection.

I'll see if I can find some other early Commonwealth stamps to file. Have a great day mates!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 10/21/2012   3:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
For the record:
The Star wmk paper was used with stamps of
Antigua,Barbados,Grenada,Natal,Queensland,St Lucia,St Vincent, and Turks island.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 10/21/2012   4:18 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply


Quote:
Therefore, I'm going to file it away as an 1862 variety, known as Scott #1 in my books.



Hehehehe, beware all you, that ignore Murphy's Law,
I am not confident about your chances.

Compared to an SG1 and an SG18 Blue greens.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,661Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.15 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05