Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Albania Forgery - Guaranteed

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 15 / Views: 6,957Next Topic  
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 05/08/2013   12:04 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Partime to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Saw this set in my collection, and copied the first stamp (Scott 62). There is a note that "Counterfeits abound". Looking at this one carefully, I can see why. Other than the poor print quality, do you see anything obvious?

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
1448 Posts
Posted 05/08/2013   01:24 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Jkjblue to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Forgery- Albania 1917-18 Scott 62 1c dark brown & green "Coat of Arms"
Forgery Scott 65 5c green & black


I'm not an expert on Albania (Far from it! ), but I do take an interest in WW classical forgeries.

Varro Tyler (Focus on Forgeries -2000) has a Forgery/Genuine comparison for the 1917-18 Double Eagle issues of Scott 54-61, and Scott 62-68.

Summarizing...
• Plating to the 12 types is the gold standard.
• There are some 50 forgeries that have been found (wow! )
• The eagle is surrounded by small dots of color that are constant for each of the twelve types in the genuines. The most common counterfeits are clearly printed, and are not surrounded by dots around the eagle.
• The tips of the eagles feathers are often broken in the genuines, while in the common counterfeits, the eagle wing tips are not broken.
• Count the horizontal framelines between the thick outer and inner framelines. The genuines can vary with 5,6,or 7 frame lines, while the common forgeries have 6 framelines.
• The genuine lowest denomination "1 CTM" is printed as "1 CTS" in the common forgery.

Looking at my specimens...
• Clean, well printed eagle without broken wing tips, and no small dots surrounding the eagle....probable forgery
• Six horizontal lines between the thicker frame lines...consistant with a forgery ( although a genuine may have 6 lines also).
• The 1c dark brown & green is "1 CTS" rather than the genuine "1 CTM"
...clear evidence of a forgery!

Looking at your specimen Partime...
- Greater chance this is a genuine than my specimens!
Why?
• 5 frame lines between the thicker framelines. Remember, the most common forgeries have 6 framelines.
•The eagle wing tips look broken.
• The denomination is "1 CTM", consistant with a genuine stamp.

OTOH, I don't see many color dots around the double eagle, and it does look quite crudely drawn.

Someone with more knowledge and experience would need to give their interpretation.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Classical era collecting with the Blues
http://bigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 05/08/2013   01:49 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Well, that is quite interesting ... I had thought that the 1 CTM was the dead give away as my Scott's doesn't even mention that variety for the 1 CTS. I'll have to look closer at my other specimens and scan tomorrow to see if they are not forgeries, especially looking for the color dots, etc. I might have to change the title of this thread. Thanks for the information.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 05/08/2013   09:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here are my other examples. All crudely drawn. All with 5 horizontal lines. None have the color dots, nor the broken wing tips. All also have similar cancels, making it look like CTO. My vote is counterfeit, but interesting to have anyway.











You wouldn't have an extra counterfeit Scott 66 that you don't need? It would be nice to fill in that extra hole.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1448 Posts
Posted 05/08/2013   10:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Jkjblue to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, they all look pretty dodgy.

(But I'm no expert either)

I have a complete set of forgeries for Scott 62-68 (lucky me ), but no extra 66, sorry.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Classical era collecting with the Blues
http://bigblue1840-1940.blogspot.com/
Edited by Jkjblue - 05/08/2013 10:16 am
Valued Member
Netherlands
30 Posts
Posted 03/20/2014   12:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add TF1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hello fellow Collectors !

I came across this post while searching for info over the stamps mentioned above .

I have a couple of questions and hope someone can help me with this
This is what I have got :





Scott 54 : Fake(s) or Genuine ??







Any ideas on the above stamps reading back on your previous post I think there's a good chance that one of those 1 CTM stamps might be genuine or ?

Notice the second picture there's a round coloured circle above the left head , would that be a plate fault ? (have moore stamps in this series with that circle)

Hope someone can shed some light on this.

best regards,
Eric
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by TF1 - 03/20/2014 12:07 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2953 Posts
Posted 03/20/2014   12:58 pm  Show Profile Check Rileysan's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Rileysan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I don't collect Albania, but find the topic interesting nonetheless. I grabbed my Scott classic catalogue and can offer one clue as to the authenticity of your stamps.

There is no 1 "CTM" variety listed in Scott. Scott only lists the 2 CTM and 3 CTM. That tells me that your first two stamps are almost certainly forgeries. I can't offer an opinion on your 3rd stamp.

Brian
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts
Posted 03/20/2014   12:58 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
TF1, welcome to the forum! En hoe is het weer in Nederland? I am no expert when it comes to these, but after reading the above threads I believe your first two stamps are genuine, the third one is fake.
And yes, I believe the circles may be a plate fault.

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Netherlands
30 Posts
Posted 03/20/2014   1:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add TF1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Helo guys thank you for the input !

I myself don;t have a specialized catalogue for the Balkan and like Rilesan says in scott for instance a 1 CTM version is not mentioned , but that could be because they are rare and therefore not mentioned in a "standard" catalogue .

I'm 99% sure the 3rd stamp I posted is indeed a Fake but the "jury is still out" on the first 2 stamps..

cheers,
Eric


@Peter, heerlijk weertje hiero joh ! graadje of 19 vandaag ...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts
Posted 03/20/2014   1:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Eric, we hebben hier in het zuid-oosten ( Georgia ) nu voor het eest in maanden goed weer!
The first two are in my opinion genuine because of several factors. The main one being the broken wingtips. Also 5 framelines between the thick outer ones and CTM instead of CTS.
I can on your scans see colordots which is another clue to its being genuine.

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2953 Posts
Posted 03/20/2014   2:16 pm  Show Profile Check Rileysan's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Rileysan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Rilesan says in scott for instance a 1 CTM version is not mentioned , but that could be because they are rare and therefore not mentioned in a "standard" catalogue .


Scott is notorius for not listing all varieties of stamps. However, Scott does not dismiss items just because they are rare. Scott lists all the unique million dollar stamps I could think of, and Scott also lists the known "CTM" error stamps from Albania ($100 stamps). I think it highly unlikely they would leave this one out just because it's allegedly rare. Afterall, I see three copies in this thread alone. How rare can it be?

My money is on these being forgeries ...

Brian
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Netherlands
30 Posts
Posted 03/20/2014   2:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add TF1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
@RileySan Jkjblue posted this earlier in this threat :


Quote:
Varro Tyler (Focus on Forgeries -2000) has a Forgery/Genuine comparison for the 1917-18 Double Eagle issues of Scott 54-61, and Scott 62-68.

Summarizing...
• Plating to the 12 types is the gold standard.
• There are some 50 forgeries that have been found (wow! )
• The eagle is surrounded by small dots of color that are constant for each of the twelve types in the genuines. The most common counterfeits are clearly printed, and are not surrounded by dots around the eagle.
• The tips of the eagles feathers are often broken in the genuines, while in the common counterfeits, the eagle wing tips are not broken.
• Count the horizontal framelines between the thick outer and inner framelines. The genuines can vary with 5,6,or 7 frame lines, while the common forgeries have 6 framelines.
• The genuine lowest denomination "1 CTM" is printed as "1 CTS" in the common forgery.



wouldn't this mean that there are indeed 1 CTM stamps or am I reading this wrong ?

Eric
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2953 Posts
Posted 03/20/2014   2:54 pm  Show Profile Check Rileysan's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Rileysan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Some days I just need to stay in bed. CTM is the actual denomination! Thanks for the correction. /facepalm
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 03/20/2014   4:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I wonder if anyone has noticed that my original posted stamps are quite different than the later ones posted by TF1. The most noticeable difference is on the left and right sides.

On my stamp, the Left side, reading up, is "Republika"
Right side, reading down, is "Shqipetare"

On the TR1 stamps, the Left side, reading up, is "Shqiperie"
Right side, reading down, is "Vetqeveritare"

Note that JKjBlue's also match my Left/Right sides.

(I completely forgot about this older post ...)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Partime - 03/20/2014 4:20 pm
Valued Member
Netherlands
30 Posts
Posted 03/20/2014   5:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add TF1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Partime !

the texts on the sides of the stamps are different because your serie is the 62-68 serie and mine is the 54-61 :)

I have both in my collection :



Scott 54-61





Scott 62-68




Does anyone knows if the following stamps are indeed real and if the supposed "plate errors" (coloured circle above left head) is catalogized somewhere and what would be the added value ??

Scott 59


Scott 54 (CTM)


Scott 61


I also noticed a difference in the tekst layout of Scott 61


Your input is much appreciated !
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by TF1 - 03/20/2014 6:46 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 03/20/2014   10:10 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
the texts on the sides of the stamps are different because your serie is the 62-68 serie and mine is the 54-61


Well, that makes total sense then, doesn't it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 15 / Views: 6,957Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05