Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Newfoundland - Scott 92 And 92A

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 3,028Next Topic  
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 10/07/2014   6:29 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wert to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hi guys...Take a look at these 2 stamps...Scott #92 and #92a...The difference is in the backwards "Z" in the word "colonization"...#92 has the backward "Z" and #92a is corrected.



There are a couple of things going on with these stamps...
1 - Maybe first donut ever.....See picture below.



2 - 92a has all the verticle lines over "the guiding spirit" missing that 92 has..See picture below.



3 - Dont know what this is on the number "6"..?...See picture below.



ANY HELP APPRECIATED..THANKS, ROBERT

ALSO THESE STAMPS ARE SUPPOSE TO HAVE A PERF. OF 12 x12...TAKE A LOOK BELOW..??


Send note to Staff
Edited by wert - 10/07/2014 7:10 pm

Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts
Posted 10/07/2014   8:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Wert, I believe you do not own a Newfoundland catalog, do you? The stamp with perf 12 was from the first printing. The perf 14 stamp is from the 1911 printing. I looked it up on Stampworld!
I believe the circle around the 6 was something amiss on the plate? The 'z' that is reversed you should know! The printer had a party the night before and had a few too many!

Peter.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
6525 Posts
Posted 10/07/2014   9:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jamesw to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The spot on the stamp was caused by a piece of dirt on the plate during printing. Printers call it an 'ink hickey'. Happens all the time in printing and certainly does not add any value to the stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 10/07/2014   10:45 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Peter....first congradulations on 1000 posts my friend...
Ya...got to get a good NFLD book....thanks jamesw for that info...helpful.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
New Zealand
726 Posts
Posted 10/08/2014   11:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tommy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Wert,

stop teasing me--and thanks for throwing all these Newfies out there.

these stamps were part of the John Guy issues from 1910/1911 to commerate the 300th anniversary of the second British Plantation in the Americas--at Cupers Cove (Cupids) in Conception Bay in 1610, under...John Guy.

Lithography was used for the first but had poor quality, so a second series was engraved. Occasionally there are watermarks (so check) : MONCKTON BASTED MILLS KENT or WHITEHEAD MORRIS & CO LTD/LONDON SOUTH AFRICA & EGYPT

Your stamp on the left is Lord Bacon, from 1910, and claret color, and Die I (z reversed). There is also a very rare variety where the "W" and "F" are joined (so everybody check). NSSC Value is $65 VF H or $325 for the WF variety

There was also a Die II (normal Z), also claret in color. Both perf of 12x12


Your stamp on the right is still Lord Bacon but from 1911, with brown violet color, 14.2 x 14.2 (there were no cataloged varieties, presumably because the engraving was better process.


By the way, the 1 cent King James from this issue is probably the single NFLD stamp with the most litho-error varieties cataloged...at least 5 (NFW, JAMRS little g etc etc)

Thanks
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 10/08/2014   2:34 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ya tommy...I did notice that King George Scott #87 had a total of 25 errors associated with it......good eye on you...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 3,028Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.13 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05