| Author |
 Replies: 8 / Views: 1,858 |
|
|
Valued Member
447 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts |
|
|
It does not look like it. It does have some "garbage" in it, maybe like overinking or bad plate wiping. The pictures are not too clear.
Peter |
Send note to Staff 
|
|
|
Valued Member
447 Posts |
|
|
Hi all,
I added a better scan, so please have a look if it's like Peter said or you have got a different opinion. Thanks
Robi |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
447 Posts |
|
|
Thank you, and how this difference is called? Because there is a difference when you look at them, right?
Robi |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts |
|
|
If you are referring to the fact that that the overprint on the right is shifted from the expected position, there is no name for that that I am aware. You could say that the overprint is offset from the design of the stamp it is meant to cover. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
Canada
5701 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts |
|
|
Much better picture, and no, there is no doubling. And I must take back my remark about the garbage - with the better picture I do not see the fuzziness any longer. But in the left stamp you still have some overinking signs, especially between the 0 and the c.
Sorry, forgot to say the overinking is the overprint, not the stamp itself.
Peter |
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Petert4522 - 07/05/2016 5:39 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
447 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,858 |
|
Posted 07/03/2016 07:29 am
