| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,007 |
|
Valued Member
Israel
62 Posts |
|
|
I have here a MNH zep set signed on the back by a European expert. Does this affect the value of the stamps for US collectors? Thanks in advance for your help on this issue. 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
752 Posts |
|
|
If a known expert, it would have no negative bearing on my interest in the stamp |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6661 Posts |
|
|
Are you sure it's an experts mark and not a collectors mark? Personally writing on the backs of stamps makes them less desirable. Unless it's a well known expert I'd say it decreases value, just my 2¢. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
I would avoid purchasing common stamps like Zeps with any kind of mark, expert or not. It is too easy to find a set without marks so my opinion is that it lowers the value. Don |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7239 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2555 Posts |
|
|
Quote: I would avoid purchasing common stamps like Zeps with any kind of mark, expert or not. It is too easy to find a set without marks so my opinion is that it lowers the value. I agree 100% percent. Unfortunately, the European experts are responsible for much damage to the stamps that I collect. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
5461 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1820 Posts |
|
|
Note sure, but I'm guessing the PF would not certify them as NH. I think to be NH the gum needs to be truly pristine without even a thumbprint. As I said, I'm not sure, but that would be my guess. So that would mean they get priced as OG - which for the $2.60 stamp is about a $400 difference in Scotts. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
12572 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1820 Posts |
|
|
Thanks, though I believe they have tightened up on this recently, but good to see. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
635 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
149 Posts |
|
|
Those look like the C-15 - 18 so expertising helps. A certificate would be better. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Singapore
750 Posts |
|
|
I absolutely hate expertising marks. These experts don't even own the stamps, why should they even mark on property that doesn't belong to them? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
283 Posts |
|
|
Quote: I absolutely hate expertising marks. These experts don't even own the stamps, why should they even mark on property that doesn't belong to them? I agree. But I don't think there was really any other way to "guarantee" stamps back before photo attachments. I believe Stanley Ashbrook's signature runs across many valuable philatelic items. I wonder if some of those 'experts' owned the stamps themselves and were merely protecting from loss or theft. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
299 Posts |
|
|
If they are penciled in, can they be erased without disturbing the gum !   Personally never tried it though ! Got to try on a cheap stamp and see what happens. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1808 Posts |
|
|
Quote: If they are penciled in, can they be erased without disturbing the gum No, they cannot. The answer to the original question is that any writing or marking on the back of an OG NH stamp decreases its monetary value in today's US market vis-a-vis the same item without such marks, even though historically there might have been legitimate reason for the marks to have been applied. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,007 |
|