Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1st Issue Green Papers: The Eagleton Factor And Possible Philadelphia/Chicago Connections?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 1 / Views: 695Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6445 Posts
Posted 10/26/2024   7:29 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add revenuecollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Message

[I don't know what the takeaway is from all of this, and there is definitely some conjecture on my part, but it was an interesting rabbit hole to go down...]

I have maintained a census of Scott #R15e (2-cent USIR on green paper) for about 10 years, since I first discovered one in an ebay lot and obtained a clean PF cert on it. I subsequently found a second one, which also got a clean PF cert.

It's a very rare stamp, with currently 28 reported examples, but some of those were subsequently determined to be bogus or duplicates. I think the current number of discrete genuine stamps is at most 24 stamps.

Its more common sibling, Scott #R6e (2-cent Bank Check on green paper) is still scarce in its own right. I've not been as focused on R6e, nor have I been maintaining census data on it, despite the two stamps ostensibly being from the same source and produced during the same period (1866).

However, working on my website updating the R15e census and scanning a new R6e acquisition caused me to revisit the two stamps a bit more closely, and I noticed a few things that I hadn't noticed previously. It turns out that Mike Mahler wrote about the connection between R6e and the Eagleton Manufacturing Co. in his superb book U.S. Revenue Stamped Documents of the Civil War Era, a mandatory reference for anyone interested in the revenue documents of this period.

Every document with R6e on it reported to date(*) has a connection to the Eagleton Manufacturing Co. of New York.

* = There's one exception that I'll go into later.

Some examples:

Bill of lading from the Eagleton Manufacturing Co. I purchased this from Eric Jackson in 2009. Ex-Cunliffe.




There are several examples shown at Siegel Auctions, including two bills of lading from "The Union Line" where the goods were provided by... Eagleton Manufacturing Co.






There is also a bill of lading from "The Stonington Line" which also received goods from the Eagleton Manufacturing Co. (Sorry for the poor image quality; it's the best I've got.)




And lastly, the document I was scanning that caused me to notice, a bill of lading from the Camden and Amboy Railroad and Transportation, also with goods from the Eagleton Manufacturing Co. Both document and stamp are a bit mangled, but it is what it is. This came from the document balance lot in Brian Bleckwenn's collection sale at Siegel.



There are additional Eagleton-related R6e documents in the Philatelic Foundation's archive.

Normally, one would expect the stamp to be provided or affixed by the receiving company, but the common thread across all these documents seems to imply that Eagleton did the affixing of the revenue stamps.

The two Union Line documents indicate goods being shipped from New York to Illinois. The Camden & Amboy document indicates goods shipped from New York to Philadelphia.

New York... Illinois... Philadelphia... is there a relationship between those locations and the uses of the 1st issue green papers? If you then start looking at images of examples NOT on shipping documents, or on documents at all, one does start to see somewhat of a pattern.

Returning back to my R15e census, all save one are off document (more on that one later). Most of the cancels are manuscript with only initials and date, so not much can be gleaned there, but a few have handstamped cancels... all from Philadelphia or the area (one in New Jersey). There is one purported R15e with a San Franciscso handstamp, but it was offered without cert and subsequently withdrawn prior to sale, so I am exlcuding it.

The only identifiable company that has several examples in the R15e census is Coffin & Altemus, a Philadelphia dry goods merchant.







If you then search the Philatelic Foundation's archive for R6e examples, down at the bottom of the list is one lonely example of R6e with a Coffin & Altemus handstamp cancel.



So at least at one point in time, the company Coffin & Altemus in Philadelphia, had BOTH 1st issue green papers in use. I've not seen that fact referenced anywhere before.

So we've got green papers being used in New York, including on documents with shipments to Philadelphia and Illinois. We've got both green papers being used by a company in Philadelphia.

So what's the Illinois connection other than some of the Eagleton bills of lading with R6e indicating shipments to Illinois?

Here's where it gets curious(er) or just random coincidence.

There is currently 1 known example of R6e on CDV (Carte de Visite) and 1 known example of R15e on CDV... both from Illinois photographers.

The R6e (ex-Baryla) is on a CDV from Z. P. McMillen in Galesburg, Illinois. The blue handstamp cancel matches the photographer on the CDV imprint.





The R15e (APS and Crowe certs) is on a CDV from J. Thurlow in Peoria, Illinois.



Peoria and Galesburg are only 47 miles apart, so it's not unthinkable that a supply of green papers made it to both towns, if a quantity were sent to the Chicago area.

So where does that leave us and what does it all mean?

I can't draw any conclusions from the dates on the New York and Philadelphia documents or the cancel dates on the individual stamps as to whether one preceded the other, and the Illinois CDVs are undated as to year. The only limiting factor as to the last is that CDVs were only taxed from August 1, 1864 through July 31, 1866, and the end of that window overlaps with the New York and Philadelphia uses of both R6e and R15e.

So it could be that there were batches of the green papers sent to New York, Philadelphia, and Chicago.

Thoughts?
Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
12579 Posts
Posted 10/26/2024   7:55 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Dan - An interesting story about the Eagleton Manufacturing Company. Sorry if it is not directly on topic. I thought you may find the connection interesting.


Quote:
The Brooklyn Bridge is a suspended by four main steel wire cables. It became the first major bridge of its kind when it opened for service in May 1883 and it's unique design remains essentially the same today.

The concept of suspending a bridge with steel cables was cutting edge technology of its day, and no one was producing anything of sufficient length. In part due to local politics, the contract to make the wire was given to the Eagleton Manufacturing Company's facility on Imlay street, very near Red Hook's Atlantic Basin. The factory, generally called the Brooklyn Wire Mill, made furniture springs and hoop skirt crinoline wire for the oversized costumes of Victorian era ladies - not the wire of the caliber and length needed for the bridge. Under the plant management of Joseph L. Haigh the operation did not go smoothly or without scandal.

Washington Roebling, the bridge's architect and builder wrote up the specification for the bridge cable and put Wilhelm Hildenbrand in charge of that aspect of the project. A plan for rigorous testing the cable was set up, for as Roebling explained "If a weak wire is spliced to a strong one and stretched from tower to tower, the strength of the weak wire is the measure of the whole length".

Production seemingly started out well but in 1878, it was discovered Haigh had been secretly shipping lower strength wire to the splicing yard. Haigh was repeatedly caught and cautioned to stop delivering inferior cable but his company continued to find ways of sneaking in lesser cable as inspected lengths. Roebling and the Bridge's trustees were aware of the problem but no action against Haigh was made. Focusing on just the issue of functionality, Roebling directed that more wire strands than originally planned for be added to the bridge's cables to give them the desired strength. Haigh did end up going to jail, but for financial irregularities.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 1 / Views: 695Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.13 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05